A Confutation of Convergent Realism

@article{Laudan1981ACO,
  title={A Confutation of Convergent Realism},
  author={Larry Laudan},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1981},
  volume={48},
  pages={19 - 49}
}
  • L. Laudan
  • Published 1 March 1981
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
This essay contains a partial exploration of some key concepts associated with the epistemology of realist philosophies of science. It shows that neither reference nor approximate truth will do the explanatory jobs that realists expect of them. Equally, several widely-held realist theses about the nature of inter-theoretic relations and scientific progress are scrutinized and found wanting. Finally, it is argued that the history of science, far from confirming scientific realism, decisively… 
Scientific Realism: An Elaboration and a Defence
This paper describes the position of scientific realism and presents the basic lines of argument for the position. Simply put, scientific realism is the view that the aim of science is knowledge of
Three Paradigms of Scientific Realism: A Truthmaking Account
This paper investigates the nature of scientific realism. I begin by considering the anomalous fact that Bas van Fraassen's account of scientific realism is strikingly similar to Arthur Fine's
Realism: Metaphysical, Scientific, and Semantic
Today realism comes in many philosophical guises. In this essay, I shall review and compare three somewhat different, influential forms of realism. My own sympathies in all three cases lie on the
A Confrontation of Convergent Realism
For many years—and with some energy since Laudan’s “Confutation of Convergent Realism” (1981)—the scientific realist has sought to accommodate examples of false-yet-successful theories in the history
Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science
  • A. Kukla
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1996
Scientific realists have argued that the truth(likeness) of our theories provides the only explanation for the success of science. I consider alternative explanations proposed by antirealists. I
Is There a Compelling Argument for Ontic Structural Realism?
Structural realism first emerged as an epistemological thesis aimed to avoid the so-called pessimistic metainduction on the history of science. Some authors, however, have suggested that the
The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism Forthcoming in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
In this paper, through a critical examination of Wray’s version of the argument from underconsideration against scientific realism, I articulate a modest version of scientific realism. This modest
The epistemological status of scientific theories : an investigation of the structural realist account
In this dissertation, I examine a view called 'Epistemic Structural Realism', which holds that we can, at best, have knowledge of the structure of the physical world. Put crudely, we can know
Scientific realism and the history of science
The paper considers the two main challenges to scientific realism, stemming from confirmation holism and the underdetermination thesis as well as from semantic holism and the incommensurability
The Issue of Scientific Realism
Agazzi stages a complete, very detailed and overall convincing defence of scientific realism, its presuppositions and corollaries (mind-independence of reality, referentiality of theories, truth as
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
TLDR
Each of these stages of a research project are evaluated to clarify the sources of ambiguities and uncertainties and suggestions are offered for reducing errors and speeding scientific progress.
Objective Knowledge
Objective Knowledge presents an incisive account of the philosophical views of a major contemporary philosopher, Sir Karl R. Popper. It deals primarily with his concept of reality and his approach to
Two Dogmas of Methodology
For a very long time, much work in the philosophy of science has been predicated on the existence of two crucial dependences. The first assumed dependence is between cognitive progress or growth, on
REALISM, UNDER DETERMINATION, AND A CAUSAL THEORY OF EVIDENCE
I shall be concerned in this paper to defend scientific realism against the thesis that the structure of the scientific theories we accept is radically underdetermined by any possible experimental
On the Truthlikeness of Generalizations
TLDR
The topic of this paper is the notion of truthlikeness: Popper’s definition of verisimilitude is criticized, and an alternative approach is outlined within a simple and precise framework.
Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction*
The history of scientific theorising presents us with a number of notable accomplishments conveniently grouped together by methodologists as cases of 'the reduction of one theory to another'. The
Problems Concerning Intertheory Relations
TLDR
It is an urgent task of metascientists to intertwine these three separate threads with a view to producing a unified picture of intertheory relations.
INCOMMENSURABILITY AND THE RATIONALITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE
The Thesis of Incommensurability (henceforth referred to as 77) says that two theories separated by a revolution may be altogether incommensurable. Acceptance of 77 seems to undermine the possibility
Corroboration and the Problem of Content-Comparison
I will confine this reply to arguments that hit, or at least are aimed at, the position defended in my position paper. This means that I will concentrate mainly on the papers of Feyerabend, Hubner,
...
...