A Conceptual History of the Emergence of Bounded Rationality

@inproceedings{Klaes2002ACH,
  title={A Conceptual History of the Emergence of Bounded Rationality},
  author={Matthias Klaes},
  year={2002}
}
How to tell the history of the concept of “bounded rationality”? Historians have tended to understand concepts in two different ways (Richter 1996). In intellectual history, mentalistic or Platonist interpretations are prevalent, keeping to Arthur Lovejoy’s (1936) precept of tracing concepts as implicit assumptions or mental habits through various disciplines and epochs. In this idealist form of conceptual history, particular expressions act as secondary manifestations of an underlying… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES

The Political Attitudes of Wealth

  • 182103–5. Almond, A Gabriel
  • Journal of Politics
  • 1945
Highly Influential
10 Excerpts

The Legacy of Herbert Simon in Game Theory

  • Andrew. Seth
  • Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
  • 2004

Residual Categories and the Evolution of Economic Knowledge

  • Oxford Blackwell
  • 2003

American Political Science Review 53.4:1127–29

  • A. Simon
  • 2000

Behavioral Economics. CSWEP Newsletter, Winter

  • Camerer, Colin
  • 1999

A Comparative Per

  • 157–69. Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Karin Tilman, Frank van Vree
  • 1998

The Evolving Rationality of Rational Expectations: An Assessment

  • U. K. Edward Elgar
  • 1998

Semantic Fields and Poly

  • Fortier, A Paul, Kevin J. Keen, Luc Fortier
  • 1997

Opening a Dialogue and Recognizing an Achievement

  • W. W. Rostow
  • Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte
  • 1996

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…