A Comparison of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Device and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fracture

@article{Xu2010ACO,
  title={A Comparison of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Device and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fracture},
  author={Y Z Xu and Dechun Geng and Haiqing Mao and X S Zhu and H L Yang},
  journal={Journal of International Medical Research},
  year={2010},
  volume={38},
  pages={1266 - 1275}
}
This prospective randomized study compared the outcome of elderly patients with an unstable pertrochanteric fracture, treated with a proximal femoral nail antirotation device (PFNA; n = 51) or a dynamic hip screw (DHS; n = 55). All patients in the DHS group and nine in the PFNA group had open reductions. Incisions were significantly shorter for the PFNA than the DHS group. Blood loss and the number of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusions were significantly greater, but operation… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Retracted: Outcome of Short Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw for Fixation of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures. A Randomised Prospective Comparative Trial
TLDR
The PFNA group had a better functional outcome than the DHS group and there was no significant difference between 1 year mortality rates for the two groups.
Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with AO dynamic condylar screws (DCS) for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures
TLDR
Owing to some advantages, such as minimal exposure, reduced operative blood loss, and the achievement of biological fixation, PFNA is a better choice for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric fractures.
Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison
TLDR
Proximal femoral nail antirotation technique offers better recovery than dynamic hip screw, whereas both techniques possess the same risk of postoperative complications.
Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients
TLDR
It is indicated that PFNA yields better outcomes than DHS fixation among elderly patients with osteoporotic type 31-A1 IFFs, and this difference persisted with rates of 3.6% and 12.5% at the final follow-up.
Comparison between proximal femoral nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in Peritrochanteric fracture of femur
TLDR
PNF is better in reducing operative time, blood loss, and duration of fluoroscopy exposure, but the functional outcome at 6 months follow-up of PFNA is better than PFN.
Unstable pertrochanteric fractures. A comparison of preliminary results using three different methods of fixation
TLDR
PFNA allows less trauma, less surgical / fluoroscopy time, earlier mobilization, less hospital stay, less complications’ rate and higher union rate than the DHS, and minimizes the risk of lateral impingement to the lateral cortex encountered with PFNA.
Comparative study between proximal femoral nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in management of unstable trochanteric fractures
TLDR
PFNA significantly reduces the operative time, amount of blood loss and fluoroscopic imaging as compared to PFN, however PFNA offers no significant benefits over PFN in terms of post-operative functional recovery or complications.
NEW GENERATION NAIL VS. PLATE IN THE TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURE
TLDR
A-PFN-treated unstable intertrochanteric fractured models resisted to higher levels of axial load than the A-DHS-treated group, with statistically significant difference, however, clinical studies are required to support these results.
Is proximal femoral nail antirotation superior to gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures ? a pairwise and network meta-analysis
TLDR
Although use of PFNA may be advantageous in reducing the operative blood loss and fluoroscopy time when compared with GN and DHS, the conclusion was limited and unacceptable because of the relatively low quality of evidences with either low or very low strength of confidence.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail.
TLDR
Generally, the results of treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures were comparable for the PFN and GN, and the pitfalls and complications were similar, and mainly surgeon- or fracture-related, rather than implant-related.
Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation.
TLDR
It is suggested that the use of the proximal femoral nail may allow a faster post-operative restoration of walking ability, when compared with the dynamic hip screw.
Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients.
TLDR
The Gamma nail group had a shorter convalescence and earlier full weight-bearing, but there was no significant difference in mortality within six months, postoperative mobility, or hip function at review.
Functional Outcome in Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures With the Proximal Femoral Nail and the Medoff Sliding Plate
TLDR
There were no major differences in functional outcome or major complications between the treatment groups, and reasons other than the operated fracture seem to be equally important in determining the long-term functional ability of the patients in this study.
Proximal femoral nail – an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year
TLDR
Close to anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments was achieved in 12 patients, while limited open reduction was required in 14 patients during the follow-up period of 1 year, indicating the necessity of a careful surgical technique and modifications specific to the individual fracture pattern in order to reduce complications.
A prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.
TLDR
The DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail, however, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater.
Trochanteric Gamma Nail and Compression Hip Screw for Trochanteric Fractures: A Randomized, Prospective, Comparative Study in 210 Elderly Patients With a New Design of the Gamma Nail
TLDR
There was no difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications or rate of fixation failure between the 2 groups, and no case of secondary shaft fracture of the femur was encountered in this study.
...
...