A Comparison of Source Code Plagiarism Detection Engines

  title={A Comparison of Source Code Plagiarism Detection Engines},
  author={Thomas Lancaster and Fintan Culwin},
  journal={Computer Science Education},
Automated techniques for finding plagiarism in student source code submissions have been in use for over 20 years and there are many available engines and services. This paper reviews the literature on the major modern detection engines, providing a comparison of them based upon the metrics and techniques they deploy. Generally the most common and effective techniques are seen to involve tokenising student submissions then searching pairs of submissions for long common substrings, an example of… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 59 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.


Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 38 extracted citations

59 Citations

Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 59 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 36 references

Source code plagiarism in UK HE Computing Schools, issues, attitudes and tools. South Bank University Technical Report SBUCISM-01-02

  • F. Culwin, A. MacLeod, T. Lancaster
  • 2001
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Comparison of plagiarism detection techniques applied to student code, Part II

  • S. Saxon
  • Computer Science project, Trinity College…
  • 2000
Highly Influential
11 Excerpts

Pragmatic anti-plagiarism

  • F. Culwin, J. Naylor
  • Proceedings of the 3rd All Ireland Conference on…
  • 1995
Highly Influential
7 Excerpts

Classifications of plagiarism detection engines. Unpublished

  • T. Lancaster, F. Culwin
  • 2003
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Plagiarism detection: Experiences and issues

  • R. Irving
  • In: JISC Fifth Information Strategies Conference…
  • 2000
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…