A Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Speech: With and Without Simultaneous Reading

@inproceedings{Taake2009ACO,
  title={A Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Speech: With and Without Simultaneous Reading},
  author={Krista Taake},
  year={2009}
}
The present study assessed college students’ ability to comprehend passage materials when input is provided in different modalities: Listening–only (listening to the text; L–only), Reading–only (reading the text silently; R–only), and Reading While Listening (simultaneously reading and listening to the text; RWL). In addition, we assessed comprehension when auditory input was provided by natural (human) and synthetic (computerized) speakers. A total of 66 participants received eight passages in… 
1 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions
TLDR
The older participants recognized fewer words in the BAS than the young participants in both test conditions and did not perform as well at comprehending spoken discourse in the two test conditions, unlike the results from the BAS.
Blending Speech Output and Visual Text in the Multimodal Interface
TLDR
Redundant displays of visual text and speech have potential application in multitask situations, in multimedia presentations, and for devices with small screens, but will assist understanding of complex content when compared with speech output alone.
Bimodal Reading: Benefits of a Talking Computer for Average and Less Skilled Readers
TLDR
Results indicated that less skilled readers comprehended more with bimodal versus unimodal presentations, and results of a brief consumer satisfaction survey suggested that low-skilled readers felt most successful in terms of their comprehension when passages were presented bIModally.
Perception and Comprehension of Synthetic Speech 1
An extensive body of research on the perception of synthetic speech carried out over the past 30 years has established that listeners have much more difficulty perceiving synthetic speech than
Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening
Three studies investigated whether and under what conditions the addition of on-screen text would facilitate the learning of a narrated scientific multimedia explanation. Students were presented with
Perceptual evaluation of MITalk: The MIT unrestricted text-to-speech system
TLDR
Perceptual results suggest that very high-quality and natural sounding synthetic speech can now be produced automatically from unrestricted English text and that such a text-to-speech system could well be implemented in applied settings such as devices for computer aided instruction or a reading machine for the blind in the very near future.
Recall of passages of synthetic speech
Memory for synthetic speech versions of grade school-level materials was tested in two studies. In Experiment 1, two different versions of three simple stories were recorded in synthetic speech. The
Linguistic Cues and Memory for Synthetic and Natural Speech
TLDR
Whether certain characteristics of synthetic speech slow on-line, real-time cognitive processing and prosodic, syntactic, and semantic cues in a task requiring participants to recall sentences spoken either by a human or by one of two speech synthesizers is ascertained.
Capacity Demands in Short-Term Memory for Synthetic and .Natural Speech
TLDR
Differences in ordered recall between the synthetic and natural word lists were substantially larger for the primacy portion of the serial position curve than the recency portion, indicating that difficulties observed in the perception and comprehension of synthetic speech are due to increased processing demands in short-term memory.
...
...