A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

@inproceedings{Bonzon2016ACS,
  title={A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation},
  author={Elise Bonzon and J{\'e}r{\^o}me Delobelle and S{\'e}bastien Konieczny and Nicolas Maudet},
  booktitle={AAAI},
  year={2016}
}
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics have been proposed independently, often associated with some desirable properties. However, there is no comparative study which takes a broader perspective. This is what we propose in this work. We provide a general comparison of all these semantics… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 45 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures and tables from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 29 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…