A Big Five personality inventory in two non‐Indo‐European languages

@article{Pulver1995ABF,
  title={A Big Five personality inventory in two non‐Indo‐European languages},
  author={Aleksander Pulver and J{\"u}ri Allik and Lea Pulkkinen and Minna H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen},
  journal={European Journal of Personality},
  year={1995},
  volume={9},
  pages={109 - 124}
}
In this study we report on two successful replications of a five‐factor personality inventory in two non‐Indo‐European languages, Estonian and Finnish, which both belong to the group of Uralic languages. Costa and McCrae's (1985) NEO Personality Inventory was adapted to these two languages. By all relevant psychometric parameters neither developed construct differs from the original construct: the reliabilities of only 11 per cent for the Estonian and 36 per cent for the Finnish subscale were… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Estonian version of the NEO‐PI‐R: an examination of universal and culture‐specific aspects of the Five‐Factor Model

In this article, we examine universal and culture‐specific aspects of the Five‐Factor Model measured with the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. First, our purpose was to test the replicability of

Mean Profiles of the NEO Personality Inventory

The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and its latest version, the NEO-PI-3, were designed to measure 30 distinctive personality traits, which are grouped into Neuroticism, Extraversion,

Standardization of the NEO-PI-3 in the Greek general population

The literature suggests that overall, the psychometric properties of NEO-PI-3 scales have been found to generalize across ages, cultures, and methods of measurement, and in accord with this, the results of the current study confirm the reliability of the Greek translation and adaptation of the NEO- PI-3.

Female and male personality styles: a typological and developmental analysis.

  • L. Pulkkinen
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1996
The personality styles of 137 women and 138 men aged 27 years were examined in an ongoing Finnish longitudinal study in which the participants were first assessed at age 8, and clusters had roots in individuals' emotional and behavioral regulation from the early school years onward.

Personality trait structure as a human universal.

To assess the cross-cultural generalizability of the FFM, data from studies using 6 translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory were compared with the American factor structure and suggest that personality trait structure is universal.

Filipino personality structure and the big five model: a lexical approach.

In lexically based studies, Filipino personality dimensions were derived and related them to the Big Five model and it was concluded that the dimensions the authors labeled Concern for Others (vs. Egotism), Conscientiousness, Gregariousness, and Intellect were quite similar to Big Five Agreeableness, Cons conscientiousness, Extraversion, andIntellect, respectively.

The Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality

A review of studies on the cross-cultural generalizability of the Big Five and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality describes the convergent and divergent results of two main research
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: A cross-national evaluation.

The present research examined the generalizability of the factor structure of the Personality Research Form (PRF) across various populations. A common methodology was used for factoring 18 data bases

The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word‐classes of the Dutch language

Of the main classes of personality-descriptive words, verbs, adjectives, and nouns, the class of adjectives has figured as the constant and almost exclusive resource for taxonomic enterprises. In the

Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q‐Set and the five‐factor model

The analysis of natural language trait names and questionnaire scales has suggested that the five factors of Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness, Agreeable-ness, and Conscientiousness constitute an

A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three

The major factors from 3 models of personality are compared: Eysenck's Three Factor model, Costa and McCrae's version of the Big Five, and Zuckerman and Kuhlman's Alternative Five. The 1st study

An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.

  • L. R. Goldberg
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1990
The generality of this 5-factor model is here demonstrated across unusually comprehensive sets of trait terms, which suggest their potential utility as Big-Five markers in future studies.

Towards a refined structure of personality traits

In this article we pursue two goals. The first is a further articulation of the dimensionality of the Dutch trait domain. The second is a detailed mapping of the factorial trait structure, one which

Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality, showing substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors.

Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: the Chinese case.

There was a 1-to-1 relation of imported to indigenous factors for only 2 of the 5 indigenous factors, whereas the others were multiply determined.