A Bi-directional Big Bang/Crunch Universe within a Two-State-Vector Quantum Mechanics?

  title={A Bi-directional Big Bang/Crunch Universe within a Two-State-Vector Quantum Mechanics?},
  author={Fritz Wilhelm Bopp},
  journal={Foundations of Physics},
  • F. Bopp
  • Published 13 July 2018
  • Physics
  • Foundations of Physics
A two boundary quantum mechanics incorporating a big bang/big crunch universe is carefully considered. After a short motivation of the concept we address the central question how a proposed a-causal quantum universe can be consistent with what is known about macroscopia and how it might find experimental support. 
5 Citations

Are we living in a bidirectional big bang / big crunch universe?

The interrelation of macroscopic classical and usually microscopic quantum physics is considered. Arguments for fixed two state vector quantum mechanics are outlined in a somewhat pedagogic way. An

How to Avoid Absolute Determinismin Two Boundary Quantum Dynamics

  • F. Bopp
  • Philosophy
    Quantum Reports
  • 2020
A somewhat drastic but beautiful way to avoid a problem with simple implementations of the two boundary theory, where effective or real willful decisions can not be added as there is no consecutive macroscopic time ordering.

An Intricate Quantum Statistical Effect and the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics

  • F. Bopp
  • Physics
    Foundations of Physics
  • 2021
An intricate quantum statistical effect guides us to a deterministic, non-causal quantum universe with a given fixed initial and final state density matrix. A concept is developed on how and where

Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics and the Surjection Hypothesis

Starting with unitary quantum dynamics, we investigate how to add quantum measurements. Quantum measurements have four essential components: the furcation, the witness production, an alignment

Some Notes on Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics

A weak value analysis of quantum oblivion is performed and some new avenues for further research are suggested that offer a realistic, simple and intuitively appealing explanation to the unique role of quantum non- Events as well as to the foundations of QM.



The Two-Time Interpretation and Macroscopic Time-Reversibility

A post-selection-assisted collapse model is revisited, claiming that unlike the thermodynamic arrow of time, it can lead to reversible dynamics at the macroscopic level and enables the classical-quantum boundary to be characterized.

Time Symmetry and Asymmetry in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Cosmology

The disparity between the time symmetry of the fundamental laws of physics and the time asymmetries of the observed universe has been a subject of fascination for physicists since the late 19th

The Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Short Review

The Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics, which consists of supplementing environmental decoherence with fundamental limitations in measurement stemming from gravity, is summarized in a self-contained brief presentation including all its principal elements.

Quantum theory and determinism

Historically, appearance of the quantum theory led to a prevailing view that Nature is indeterministic. The arguments for the indeterminism and proposals for indeterministic and deterministic

Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, second edition

1 Introduction.- 2 Basic Concepts and Their Interpretation.- 3 Decoherence Through Interaction with the Environment.- 4 Decoherence in Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity.- 5 Consistent

Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says “Maybe”?

"Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

The task of quantizing general relativity raises serious questions about the meaning of the present formulation and interpretation of quantum mechanics when applied to so fundamental a structure as

Bell’s theorem and the causal arrow of time

Einstein held that the formalism of quantum mechanics involves “spooky actions at a distance.” In the 1960s, Bell amplified this by showing that the predictions of quantum mechanics disagree with the