9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline

@article{Hughes2020911TA,
  title={9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline},
  author={D. Hughes},
  journal={Alternatives: Global, Local, Political},
  year={2020},
  volume={45},
  pages={55 - 82}
}
  • D. Hughes
  • Published 2020
  • Sociology
  • Alternatives: Global, Local, Political
  • International Relations (IR) scholars uncritically accept the official narrative regarding the events of 9/11 and refuse to examine the massive body of evidence generated by the 9/11 truth movement. Nevertheless, as calls for a new inquiry into the events of 9/11 continue to mount, with the International 9/11 Consensus Panel and World Trade Centre Building 7 Evaluation inquiries having recently published their findings, and with a U.S. Federal Grand Jury on 9/11 having been announced, now would… CONTINUE READING

    Figures from this paper

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 124 REFERENCES
    9/11 as False Flag: Why International Law Must Dare to Care
    • 1
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The impact of 9/11 and the new legal landscape
    • 6
    “9/11 is alive and well” or how critical terrorism studies has sustained the 9/11 narrative
    • 12
    • PDF
    Challenges to Academic Freedom since 9/11
    • 1
    Terror in Our Time
    • 9
    • PDF
    Secret Affairs: Britain's Collusion with Radical Islam
    • 15