• Corpus ID: 14324201

2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours

@inproceedings{Sakamoto20092377PL,
  title={2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours},
  author={Yasuaki Sakamoto and Jing Ma and Jeffrey V. Nickerson},
  year={2009}
}
2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours Yasuaki Sakamoto (ysakamot@stevens.edu) Jing Ma (jma1@stevens.edu) Jeffrey V. Nickerson (jnickerson@stevens.edu) Center for Decision Technologies School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA Abstract like. Other users can digg or bury the submitted stories to vote for or against the stories. Users cannot digg the same story twice. Each digg reflects a user’s liking of a story… 

Figures from this paper

The Impact of Collective Opinion on Online Judgment

Social media are part of our everyday lives. These technologies allow people to share their opinions with others. Here I examine whether the opinions posted online actually change people's perception

Following Trendsetters: Collective Decisions in Online Social Networks

  • Yasuaki Sakamoto
  • Computer Science
    2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2012
Examination of how people process information in online social networks, using Digg as an example, reveals that users filter out stories using the choices of trendsetters, rather than using the majority decisions.

Software architectures for social influence : analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Yammer and FourSquare

This research focuses on the architectures of Facebook, Twitter, Yammer and Foursquare to date among the most common social media systems serving different user needs while essentially encouraging conversations in a collaborative environment.

Sharing Political Content in Online Social Media: A Planned and Unplanned Behaviour Approach

The study understands that sharing political content is not like sharing other forms of content such as tourist attractions—the former can provoke serious punishment in some countries, and accordingly, trait impulsiveness is negatively associated with political content sharing behaviour.

The Psychology behind People's Decision to Forward Disaster-Related Tweets

The results from questionnaires suggest that people will be more likely to share a disaster-related message in a social media environment when they perceive the message as more important, accurate, anxiety provoking, familiar, informative, and fluent.

Re-Tweet Count Matters: Social Influences on Sharing of Disaster-Related Tweets

The results of a human-subjects experiment revealed that, when the re-tweet count of a tweet increased, the likelihood that people would share the tweet increased when it came from an individual’s account, but the likelihood decreased when it happened to come from a news agency's account.

Computing the Veracity of Information through Crowds: A Method for Reducing the Spread of False Messages on Social Media

This work examined the effect of collective opinion on information forwarding in social media environments through an experiment with crowds, and showed that displaying both retweet counts and collective truthfulness ratings could reduce the spread of inaccurate health-related messages.

Predicting People's Intention Towards Sharing Political Contents in Social Media: The Moderating Effect of Collective Opinion

The empirical results support all the hypotheses except the moderating effect of collective opinion between perceived value and intention and the implications of the findings and future research directions are discussed.

The Influence of Collective Opinion on True-False Judgment and Information-Sharing Decision

The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the crowd adopted the collective credibility judgment when evaluating the credibility of a statement and the crowd followed the collective sharing likelihood when rating the likelihood of sharing a statement.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

Hypothesis I: There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and his abilities. While opinions and abilities may, at first glance, seem to be quite different things, there is a

The Karma of Digg : Reciprocity in Online Social Networks

What motivates participants to donate their time to collective intelligence web sites? We examine the possible mechanisms that drive the website Digg, an online news consolidator in which users help

Bellwethers and the emergence of trends in online communities

This work examines the processes by which collective decisions emerge by analyzing how some articles gain vast popularity in a community-based website, Digg, and shows that users’ earlier choices have some influence on the later choices of others.

Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market

An artificial “music market” was created in which 14,341 participants downloaded previously unknown songs either with or without knowledge of previous participants' choices, and increasing the strength of social influence increased both inequality and unpredictability of success.

Thinking in groups

Is cognition an exclusive property of the individual or can groups have a mind of their own? We explore this question from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. One of the principal insights

A Repetition of Asch's “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment”

The present experiment constitutes a repetition of one of Asch's investigations of the role of social pressures in the modification and distortion of judgment. The original experiment involved

Darwin's dangerous idea.

  • J. Launer
  • Education
    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians
  • 2002
Most educated people nowadays know that the authors share over 98% of their DNA with chimpanzees, but many humans may experience a frisson on learning this fact, which gives some sense of the existential horror that Darwin's contemporaries had to deal with.

Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.

The investigations described in this series are concerned with the conditions of independence and lack of independence in the face of group pressure. The abstract temper of present-day theory and

Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs

We argue that to best comprehend many data sets, plotting judiciously selected sample statistics with associated confidence intervals can usefully supplement, or even replace, standard

Categorization in the wild