Corpus ID: 14324201

2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours

@inproceedings{Sakamoto20092377PL,
  title={2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours},
  author={Yasuaki Sakamoto and Jing Ma and Jeffrey V. Nickerson},
  year={2009}
}
2377 People Like this Article: The Influence of Others’ Decisions on Yours Yasuaki Sakamoto (ysakamot@stevens.edu) Jing Ma (jma1@stevens.edu) Jeffrey V. Nickerson (jnickerson@stevens.edu) Center for Decision Technologies School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA Abstract like. Other users can digg or bury the submitted stories to vote for or against the stories. Users cannot digg the same story twice. Each digg reflects a user’s liking of a story… Expand

Figures from this paper

The Impact of Collective Opinion on Online Judgment
Social media are part of our everyday lives. These technologies allow people to share their opinions with others. Here I examine whether the opinions posted online actually change people's perceptionExpand
Following Trendsetters: Collective Decisions in Online Social Networks
  • Yasuaki Sakamoto
  • Computer Science
  • 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2012
TLDR
Examination of how people process information in online social networks, using Digg as an example, reveals that users filter out stories using the choices of trendsetters, rather than using the majority decisions. Expand
Software architectures for social influence : analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Yammer and FourSquare
Social media systems like Facebook and Twitter have experienced exponential growth in their user base as they fulfil basic human desires of communication, sharing of opinions, thoughts andExpand
Sharing Political Content in Online Social Media: A Planned and Unplanned Behaviour Approach
TLDR
The study understands that sharing political content is not like sharing other forms of content such as tourist attractions—the former can provoke serious punishment in some countries, and accordingly, trait impulsiveness is negatively associated with political content sharing behaviour. Expand
The Psychology behind People's Decision to Forward Disaster-Related Tweets
TLDR
The results from questionnaires suggest that people will be more likely to share a disaster-related message in a social media environment when they perceive the message as more important, accurate, anxiety provoking, familiar, informative, and fluent. Expand
Re-Tweet Count Matters: Social Influences on Sharing of Disaster-Related Tweets
Abstract Communication during and after disasters increasingly relies on social media technologies. For example, victims, emergency responders, and others took to Twitter to share information aboutExpand
Computing the Veracity of Information through Crowds: A Method for Reducing the Spread of False Messages on Social Media
TLDR
This work examined the effect of collective opinion on information forwarding in social media environments through an experiment with crowds, and showed that displaying both retweet counts and collective truthfulness ratings could reduce the spread of inaccurate health-related messages. Expand
Computing the Veracity of Information Through Crowds: A Method for Reducing the Spread of False Messages on Social Media
Twitter and other social media allow people to post their experiences and opinions online. This information can be useful for making informed decisions. However, people can unintentionally spreadExpand
Predicting People's Intention Towards Sharing Political Contents in Social Media: The Moderating Effect of Collective Opinion
TLDR
The empirical results support all the hypotheses except the moderating effect of collective opinion between perceived value and intention and the implications of the findings and future research directions are discussed. Expand
The Influence of Collective Opinion on True-False Judgment and Information-Sharing Decision
TLDR
The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the crowd adopted the collective credibility judgment when evaluating the credibility of a statement and the crowd followed the collective sharing likelihood when rating the likelihood of sharing a statement. Expand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
Hypothesis I: There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and his abilities. While opinions and abilities may, at first glance, seem to be quite different things, there is aExpand
The Karma of Digg : Reciprocity in Online Social Networks
What motivates participants to donate their time to collective intelligence web sites? We examine the possible mechanisms that drive the website Digg, an online news consolidator in which users helpExpand
Bellwethers and the emergence of trends in online communities
Group-level phenomena, such as trends and congestion, are difficult to predict as behaviors at the group-level typically diverge from simple aggregates of behaviors at the individuallevel. In theExpand
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
TLDR
An artificial “music market” was created in which 14,341 participants downloaded previously unknown songs either with or without knowledge of previous participants' choices, and increasing the strength of social influence increased both inequality and unpredictability of success. Expand
Thinking in groups
Is cognition an exclusive property of the individual or can groups have a mind of their own? We explore this question from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. One of the principal insightsExpand
A Repetition of Asch's “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment”
The present experiment constitutes a repetition of one of Asch's investigations of the role of social pressures in the modification and distortion of judgment. The original experiment involvedExpand
Darwin's dangerous idea.
  • J. Launer
  • Medicine, Biology
  • QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians
  • 2002
TLDR
Most educated people nowadays know that the authors share over 98% of their DNA with chimpanzees, but many humans may experience a frisson on learning this fact, which gives some sense of the existential horror that Darwin's contemporaries had to deal with. Expand
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.
The investigations described in this series are concerned with the conditions of independence and lack of independence in the face of group pressure. The abstract temper of present-day theory andExpand
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
We argue that to best comprehend many data sets, plotting judiciously selected sample statistics with associated confidence intervals can usefully supplement, or even replace, standardExpand
Categorization in the wild
TLDR
Key aspects of categorization that have received little previous attention emerge from considering diverse types of classification together, such as the social factors that create stability in classification systems, and the interoperability that shared conceptual systems establish between agents. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...