• DOI:10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B
• Corpus ID: 19605781

2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference

@article{Levy20032001SI,
  title={2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference},
  author={Mitchell M. Levy and Mitchell P. Fink and John C. Marshall and Edward Abraham and Derek C. Angus and Deborah J. Cook and Jonathan Cohen and Steven M. Opal and Jean Louis Vincent and G. Ramsay},
  journal={Critical Care Medicine},
  year={2003},
  volume={31},
  pages={1250-1256}
}

• M. Levy, M. Fink, +7 authors G. Ramsay
• Published 1 April 2003
• Medicine
• Critical Care Medicine

ObjectiveIn 1991, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a “Consensus Conference,” the goals of which were “to provide a conceptual and a practical framework to define the systemic inflammatory response to infection, which is a progressive injurious process that falls under the generalized term ‘sepsis’ and includes sepsis-associated organ dysfunction as well.” The general definitions introduced as a result of that conference have been widely used in practice and have served as the foundation for inclusion criteria for numerous clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, there has been an impetus from experts in the field to modify these definitions to reflect our current understanding of the pathophysiology of these syndromes. DesignSeveral North American and European intensive care societies agreed to revisit the definitions for sepsis and related conditions. This conference was sponsored by the SCCM, The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the Surgical Infection Society (SIS). MethodsThe conference was attended by 29 participants from Europe and North America. In advance of the conference, five subgroups were formed to evaluate the following areas: signs and symptoms of sepsis, cell markers, cytokines, microbiologic data, and coagulation parameters. The subgroups corresponded electronically before the conference and met in person during the conference. A spokesperson for each group presented the deliberation of each group to all conference participants during a plenary session. A writing committee was formed at the conference and developed the current article based on executive summary documents generated by each group and the plenary group presentations. The present article serves as the final report of the 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference. ConclusionThis document reflects a process whereby a group of experts and opinion leaders revisited the 1992 sepsis guidelines and found that apart from expanding the list of signs and symptoms of sepsis to reflect clinical bedside experience, no evidence exists to support a change to the definitions. This lack of evidence serves to underscore the challenge still present in diagnosing sepsis in 2003 for clinicians and researchers and also provides the basis for introducing PIRO as a hypothesis-generating model for future research.