Corpus ID: 16100857

2 Why the distinction between basic ( theoretical ) and applied ( practical ) research is important in the politics of science

@inproceedings{RollHansen20092WT,
  title={2 Why the distinction between basic ( theoretical ) and applied ( practical ) research is important in the politics of science},
  author={N. Roll-Hansen},
  year={2009}
}
  • N. Roll-Hansen
  • Published 2009
  • The term “basic research” is ubiquitous in present debates on policy in science and higher education. It is a term with positive connotations, important for example in legitimising traditional universities. The popular term “researc h” generally corresponds to “research and development” (R&D) in official statistics. This inc ludes “applied research” and “technological development” as well as “basic resea rch.” In public discourse these distinctions are regularly overlooked. “Research” s imply… CONTINUE READING
    32 Citations

    Tables from this paper

    Instrumentalism and epistemic responsibility : researchers and the impact agenda in the UK and Australia
    • 4
    • PDF
    The compartmentalisation of social science: What are the implications?
    • 2
    • PDF
    Executive incentives as an instrument of leadership – Says who?
    • 1
    Interpreting Salt Marsh Dynamics: Challenging Scientific Paradigms
    • 6
    Relationship Of Setting And Gender With Teachers’ Self Efficacy In Pakistan
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
    The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research
    • R. Nelson
    • Economics
    • Journal of Political Economy
    • 1959
    • 2,533
    • PDF
    Boundaries of Science
    • 437
    Criteria for scientific choice
    • 127
    Research, Bureaucracy and the
    • 1985
    Eugenics before World War II: The case of Norway.
    • N. Roll-Hansen
    • Biology, Medicine
    • History and philosophy of the life sciences
    • 1980
    • 11
    The Complexity of Scientifi
    • 1966
    The Simple Economics
    • 1959