Corpus ID: 33596188

2 Elections , Accountability , and the Role of Challengers

@inproceedings{Gordon20062E,
  title={2 Elections , Accountability , and the Role of Challengers},
  author={S. Gordon and G. Huber},
  year={2006}
}
  • S. Gordon, G. Huber
  • Published 2006
  • What is the marginal effect of competitiveness on the power of electoral incentives? Addressing this question empirically is difficult because challenges to incumbents are endogenous to their behavior in office. To overcome this obstacle, we exploit a unique feature of Kansas courts: fourteen districts employ partisan elections to select judges, while seventeen employ noncompetitive retention elections. In the latter, therefore, challengers are ruled out. We find judges in partisan systems… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Tables from this paper.

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
    An Economic Theory of Democracy
    • 11,412
    Congress: The Electoral Connection
    • 3,687
    • Open Access
    Incumbent performance and electoral control
    • 1,850
    The control of politicians: An economic model
    • 1,332
    The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government
    • 743
    • Open Access
    Constituency Influence in Congress
    • 1,132
    Elected Versus Appointed Regulators: Theory and Evidence
    • 385
    • Open Access
    Information and elections
    • 454
    • Open Access