1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations

@article{Ambainis19981wayQF,
  title={1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations},
  author={Andris Ambainis and Rusins Freivalds},
  journal={Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)},
  year={1998},
  pages={332-341}
}
  • A. AmbainisR. Freivalds
  • Published 24 February 1998
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)
We study 1-way quantum finite automata (QFAs). First, we compare them with their classical counterparts. We show that, if an automaton is required to give the correct answer with a large probability (greater than 7/9), then any 1-way QFAs can be simulated by a 1-way reversible automaton. However, quantum automata giving the correct answer with smaller probabilities are more powerful than reversible automata. Second, we show that 1-way QFAs can be very space-efficient. We construct a 1-way QFA… 

Figures from this paper

One-Way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States

It is proved that coin-tossing one-way probabilistic finite automata (coin-Tossing 1PFA) and one- way quantum finite Automata with control language (1QFACL) as well as several other models of QFA, can be simulated by 1QCFA.

Empowering measures for quantum finite automata (QFA)

  • S. D. PaniC. Behera
  • Computer Science, Physics
    2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development
  • 2011
This paper discusses about 1-QFA and 2-Q FA and their drawbacks, and introduces an algorithm by implementing 1-way quantum finite k-counter automata (1-QFk-CA) with multiple scanning of the input string to improve the power of QFAs.

Characterizations of one-way general quantum finite automata

Quantum Finite Automata : a Language Acceptor Model

This survey work has drawn a comparison among 1- way QFA, 2-way QFA and 1.5-wayQFA, and discussed about the strengths and weakness of all these QFA models and the power of Quantum Finite State Automata.

One-way quantum finite automata together with classical states

A new computing model of 1QFA, namely, one-way quantum finite automata together with classical states (1QFAC for short), is developed, a component of classical states is added, and the choice of unitary evolution of quantum states at each step is closely related to the current classical state.

On the Weakness of One-Way Quantum Pushdown Automata

  • M. Nakanishi
  • Computer Science
    2010 Fourth International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies
  • 2010
This work focuses on (empty-stack acceptance) one-way quantum pushdown automata, and shows that there exists a regular language which one- way quantum push down automata cannot recognize.

Succinctness of two-way probabilistic and quantum finite automata

It is proved that two-way probabilistic and quantum finite automata (2PFAs and 2QFAs) can be considerably more concise than both their one-way versions, and two- way nondeterministic finite automaton (2NFAs), and it is shown that 2ZFAs with mixed states can support highly efficient probability amplification.

Quantum Computing: 1-Way Quantum Automata

This paper analyzes several models of 1-way quantum finite automata and compares their behaviors with those of measure-once, measure-many and reversible 1- way quantum automata.

Revisiting the Power and Equivalence of One-Way Quantum Finite Automata

A new proof is given for the fact that measure-many one-way quantum finite automata (MM-1QFA) recognize only regular languages with bounded error and generalizes the proof to a broader class of automata that include probabilistic automata and some kinds of quantum finite Automata.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES

On the power of quantum finite state automata

It is proved that the class of languages recognizing by linear time, bounded error 2qfa's properly includes the regular languages, and 1-way and 2-way quantum finite state automata are introduced, which are the quantum analogues of deterministic, nondeterministic and probabilistic 1- way and2-way finite state Automata.

On the space efficiency of one way quantum finite automata

A family of finite regular languages such that any 1-way quantum finite automaton (QFA) accepting L_n with probability 1/2 + epsilon must have 2^{Omega(n/log n)} states.

Quantum complexity theory

This paper gives the first formal evidence that quantum Turing machines violate the modern (complexity theoretic) formulation of the Church--Turing thesis, and proves that bits of precision suffice to support a step computation.

On the power of 2-way probabilistic finite state automata

The recognition power of two-way probabilistic finite-state automata (2PFAs) is studied. It is shown that any 2PFA recognizing a nonregular language must use exponential expected time infinitely

Quantum automata and quantum grammars

On Reversible Automata

Four non-trivial characterizations of the languages accepted by a reversible automaton equipped with a set of initial and final states are given and it is shown that one can effectively decide whether a given rational (or regular) language can be accepted by the automaton.

Running Time to Recognize Nonregular Languages by 2-Way Probabilistic Automata

The running time for the recognition of nonregular 2-dimensional languages by 4-way pfa can be essentially smaller, namely, linear.

The Complexity of Probabilistic versus Deterministic Finite Automata

We show that there exists probabilistic finite automata with an isolated cutpoint and n states such that the smallest equivalent deterministic finite automaton contains \(\Omega \left(