1 Language and thought : Which side are you on , anyway ?

@inproceedings{Regier20081LA,
  title={1 Language and thought : Which side are you on , anyway ?},
  author={Terry Regier and Paul Kay and Aubrey L. Gilbert and Richard B. Ivry},
  year={2008}
}
The debate over language and thought has traditionally been framed by two opposing stances: „universalist‟ and „relativist‟. The universalist view holds that language is shaped by universals of human cognition; on this view, languages make semantic distinctions drawn from a limited palette of universally available options – and when languages do differ semantically, those linguistic differences do not affect cognition. The relativist view in contrast, often attributed to Whorf (1956), holds… CONTINUE READING
5 Citations
58 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 58 references

What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis

  • P. Kay, W. Kempton
  • American Anthropologist,
  • 1984
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution

  • B. Berlin, P. Kay
  • 1969
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Color categories are culturally diverse in cognition as well as in language

  • D. Roberson
  • Cross-Cultural Research, 39(1), 56-71.
  • 2005
3 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…