• DOI:10.1080/1466097042000235173
• Corpus ID: 153999309

1 ‘Heads in the Sand’: Football, Politics and Crowd Disasters in Twentieth‐Century Britain1

@article{Johnes20041I,
  title={1 ‘Heads in the Sand’: Football, Politics and Crowd Disasters in Twentieth‐Century Britain1},
  author={Martin Johnes},
  journal={Soccer \& Society},
  year={2004},
  volume={5},
  pages={134 - 151}
}

• M. Johnes
• Published 1 January 2004
• History
• Soccer & Society

Over the course of the twentieth century, 276 people lost their lives in disasters at UK football grounds.2Yet it is surprising that such tragedies did not occur more frequently. The rapid speed with which the game's popularity developed in the late nineteenth century meant that football grounds were built quickly and crudely. Any profits that clubs made were usually invested in players rather than spectators' facilities. Eager to see their teams succeed on the pitch, fans were usually happy with such prioritizing. Thus, as the century progressed and the game developed on and off the field, improvements in the condition of grounds were limited. Inside these grounds were often large, compact, swaying and sometimes inflamed crowds. Quite simply, the assembly of large numbers of excited supporters on decrepit terraces was a recipe for disaster. Disasters have powerful emotional, psychological and social impacts. They bring home the realities of risk in a way that abstract possibilities cannot. This creates expectations and demands for action to ensure there can be no repetition.3Yet the extent to which expectations are fulfilled, and the force with which they are demanded, depends very much on the political circumstances of the tragedy and those affected. This chapter explores the responses to football disasters in the UK. It aims to show how the responses have been characterized by an apathy towards safety amongst the football authorities, central government and fans. This apathy was rooted in a desire to exclude sport from legislation, in the terrace culture of the game, in the characterization of fans as hooligans and in the exclusion of the safety of football fans from the concerns of central government.