(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis

  title={(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis},
  author={V. Braun and V. Clarke},
  journal={International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
  pages={739 - 743}
  • V. Braun, V. Clarke
  • Published 2016
  • Sociology
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • One of us (VC) was having a conversation with a student recently about the origins and history of thematic analysis (TA). The student had read Qualitative Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy (McLeod, 2011), a text which presents TA as a variant of grounded theory. Victoria commented that she thought that TA evolved from content analysis, and therefore predated grounded theory, and discussed her recent discovery of the use of a variant of TA in psychotherapy research in the 1930s-1950s… CONTINUE READING
    88 Citations
    Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis
    • 9
    Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
    • 296
    Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point
    • 3
    • PDF
    A conceptual-empirical typology of social science research methods pedagogy
    • 5
    • PDF


    Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
    • 3,070
    • PDF
    Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool
    • 234
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Sampling and thematic analysis: a response to Fugard and Potts
    • 31
    Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners
    • 2,703
    • PDF
    Using thematic analysis in psychology
    • 61,412
    • PDF
    Underdeveloped Themes in Qualitative Research: Relationship With Interviews and Analysis
    • 31
    How Many Interviews Are Enough?
    • 8,258
    • PDF
    Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
    • 1,472
    Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?
    • I. Coyne
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Journal of advanced nursing
    • 1997
    • 1,710
    • PDF