'Necessary', 'a priori' and 'analytic'

@article{Sloman1965NecessaryP,
  title={'Necessary', 'a priori' and 'analytic'},
  author={Aaron Sloman},
  journal={Analysis},
  year={1965},
  volume={26},
  pages={12-16}
}
  • A. Sloman
  • Published 1 October 1965
  • Computer Science
  • Analysis
I T is frequently taken for granted, both by people discussing logical distinctions1 and by people using them2, that the terms 'necessary', 'a priori', and 'analytic' are equivalent, that they mark not three distinctions, but one. Occasionally an attempt is made3 to establish that two or more of these terms are equivalent. However, it seems to me far from obvious that they are or can be shown to be equivalent, that they cannot be given definitions which enable them to mark important and… Expand
Are the Notions ‘A Priori Truth’ and ‘Necessary Truth’ Extensionally Equivalent?
There is a widely held view that the expressions 'necessary truth', 'a priori truth' and 'analytic truth' either express the same concept or, at least, refer to all and only the same items.1Expand
Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic
Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the doctrine that logic does not require its own epistemology, for its methods are continuous with those of science. Although most recently urged by Williamson, theExpand
Analytic vs. Synthetic and a Priori vs. A Posteriori
The division of human cognitive faculties into those based on reason and those based on experience belongs to the standard epistemological vocabulary. The controversy between empiricism andExpand
Philosophical Accounts of First-Order Logical Truths
Starting from certain metalogical results (the completeness theorem, the soundness theorem, and Lindenbaum-Scott theorem), I argue that first-order logical truths of classical logic are a priori andExpand
DRAFT: Revised September 15, 2013 Evolution of Geometrical Reasoning Previous title: “Incomputability of Geometrical Reasoning ”.. 3
There are competences produced by biological evolution plus individual learning and development in humans (and probably several other species), that are important for perceiving, understanding andExpand
Overturning negative construal of quantum superposition
Construal of observable facts or events, that is, the manner in which we understand reality, is based not only on mathematical formulas of a theory suggested as a reasonable explanation for physicalExpand
The 5 Questions
I was an undergraduate in both mathematics and philosophy at the University of Keele in the 1960s. We studied a little logic in both subjects, but there was barely any attempt to connect logic withExpand
Reasoning About Continuous Deformation of Curves on a torus and other things. (CHANGING DRAFT: Stored copies will become out of date.)
This is one of several online discussions, with examples, of kinds of mathematical competence that seem to have evolved from abilities to perceive and reason about proto-affordances[*] in theExpand
Architectural and Representational Requirements for Seeing Processes, Proto-affordances and Affordances
  • A. Sloman
  • Computer Science
  • Logic and Probability for Scene Interpretation
  • 2008
This paper, combining the standpoints of philosophy and Artificial Intelligence with theoretical psychology, summarises several decades of investigation by the author of the variety of functions ofExpand
Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics and Young Robots
  • A. Sloman
  • Computer Science
  • AISC/MKM/Calculemus
  • 2008
TLDR
It is argued that a suitable multi-functional self-extending architecture will enable human-like mathematical learning within a machine, and can support Kant's philosophy of mathematics, as against Humean philosophies. Expand
...
1
2
3
...