“Without the Help of Glasses”: The Anthropocentric Spectacle of Nehemiah Grew’s Botany

@article{Coppola2013WithoutTH,
  title={“Without the Help of Glasses”: The Anthropocentric Spectacle of Nehemiah Grew’s Botany},
  author={Al Coppola},
  journal={The Eighteenth Century},
  year={2013},
  volume={54},
  pages={263 - 277}
}
This article takes issue with a widely-held critical consensus about early modern natural philosophy, which posits that scientific apparatuses and prostheses, particularly the microscope, were enthusiastically embraced by natural philosophers, who prized them for opening up vast new regions of the knowable to the scientific observer while cultivating a “culture of fact” that sought the epistemological ground for knowledge in the ostensibly certain and manifest ocular proofs that these new… CONTINUE READING

Figures from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES

Rhetoric and Graphics in Micrographia

John T. Harwood
  • Robert Hooke: New Studies, ed. Simon Schaffer and Hunter (Woodbridge,
  • 1989

Fournier; Catherine Wilson, The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope (Princeton, 1995); Thomas L

See
  • Hankins and Robert J. Silverman, Instruments and the Imagination (Princeton, 1995); and Edward G. Ruestow, The Microscope in the Dutch Republic: The Shaping of Discovery (Cambridge, 1996). See also Barbara J. Shapiro, A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720 (Ithaca, 2000), chs. 5 and 6; and Svetlana A
  • 1983

Harwood , “ Rhetoric and Graphics in Micrographia ” in Robert Hooke : New Studies

T. John
  • 1982

Microscopy and the Seventeenth Century (Baltimore, 1996), 72

Marian Fournier, The Fabric of Life
  • See also: William Carruthers, “The President’s Address: On the Life and Work of Nehemiah Grew,” Journal of the Royal Microscopial Society (1902): 129–41; Agnes Arber, “Nehemiah Grew
  • 1712