“The sum of all human knowledge”: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia

@article{Mesgari2015TheSO,
  title={“The sum of all human knowledge”: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia},
  author={Mostafa Mesgari and Chitu Okoli and Mohamad Mehdi and Finn {\AA}rup Nielsen and Arto Lanam{\"a}ki},
  journal={Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
  year={2015},
  volume={66}
}
Wikipedia may be the best‐developed attempt thus far to gather all human knowledge in one place. Its accomplishments in this regard have made it a point of inquiry for researchers from different fields of knowledge. A decade of research has thrown light on many aspects of the Wikipedia community, its processes, and its content. However, due to the variety of fields inquiring about Wikipedia and the limited synthesis of the extensive research, there is little consensus on many aspects of… Expand
Disciplines and the Categorization of Scientific Truth: The Case of Social Sciences in the Hebrew Wikipedia
For the general audience, Wikipedia is considered the source of “truth,” especially for scientific knowledge. While studies of Wikipedia usually focus on the accuracy of the knowledge within it, fewExpand
Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?
TLDR
The results show that citations from Wikipedia to articles are too rare for most research evaluation purposes, with only 5% of articles being cited in all fields, and so Wikipedia is not recommended for evaluations affecting stakeholder interests. Expand
Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership
TLDR
This systematic literature review of 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed concludes with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community. Expand
The Transmission of Scientific Knowledge to Wikipedia
TLDR
It is found that, controlling for im- pact factor and open access policy, Wikipedia over-represents journals from the Social Sciences, and under-rep Representation of Journals from the Physical Sciences and Health Sciences and an open-access policy is not associated with increased Wikipedia presence. Expand
Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: a case study in Library and Information Science
TLDR
The coverage of Library and Information Science literature published between 2001 and 2010 in Wikipedia is explored, paying special attention to the methodological issues involved in counting Wikipedia citations, revealing severe limitations in the use of Wikipedia citations for research evaluation. Expand
Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science
TLDR
Findings provide evidence is that a major consequence of open access policies is to significantly amplify the diffusion of science, through an intermediary like Wikipedia, to a broad audience. Expand
A Study of Citations to Wikipedia in Scholarly Publications
ABSTRACT The debate on using Wikipedia as a credible academic information resource is dynamic and controversial. This study used the Web of Science (WoS) database and its “Cited Reference” andExpand
Multiple Texts as a Limiting Factor in Online Learning: Quantifying (Dis-)similarities of Knowledge Networks
TLDR
The article develops a hybrid model of intra- and intertextual similarity of different parts of the information landscape and tests this model on the example of 35 languages and corresponding Wikipedias, and goes beyond existing approaches by examining their structural and semantic aspects intra-and intertextually. Expand
A comparison of title words for journal articles and Wikipedia pages: Coverage and stylistic differences?
This article assesses whether there are gaps in Wikipedia’s coverage of academic information and whether there are non-obvious stylistic differences from academic journal articles that WikipediaExpand
Excavating the mother lode of human-generated text: A systematic review of research that uses the wikipedia corpus
TLDR
This article systematically reviews the scholarly studies that have used Wikipedia as a data source, and investigates the means by which Wikipedia has been employed in three main computer science research areas: information retrieval, natural language processing, and ontology building. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 160 REFERENCES
Protocol for a systematic literature review of research on the Wikipedia
TLDR
This article presents a protocol for conducting a systematic mapping of research on Wikipedia, and identifies what research has been conducted; what research questions have been asked, which have been answered; and what theories and methodologies have been employed to study Wikipedia. Expand
An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility
TLDR
A difference was found in the credibility of the articles — the experts found Wikipedia’s articles to be more credible than the non–experts, suggesting that the accuracy of Wikipedia is high, however, the results should not be seen as support for Wikipedia as a totally reliable resource. Expand
An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia
Many have questioned the reliability and accuracy of Wikipedia. Here a different issue, but one closely related: how broad is the coverage of Wikipedia? Differences in the interests and attention ofExpand
Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia
  • D. Fallis
  • Computer Science
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2008
TLDR
To improve Wikipedia, it is suggested that to clarify what the authors' epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does, changes to Wikipedia need to be identified. Expand
AN ANALYSIS OF WIKIPEDIA
TLDR
It is demonstrated that Wikipedia is indeed subject to free-riding, and a novel explanation for the mitigation of under-provision under such circumstances is offered. Expand
Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds
A very conspicuous part of the new participatory media, Wikipedia has emerged as the Internet's leading source of all-purpose information, the volume and range of its articles far surpassing that ofExpand
Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership
TLDR
This systematic literature review of 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed concludes with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community. Expand
Wikipedia: friend or foe?
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on a research study that entailed the rigorous evaluation of the quality of a large multidisciplinary sample of Wikipedia articles. The objective ofExpand
A Brief Review of Studies of Wikipedia in Peer-Reviewed Journals
  • Chitu Okoli
  • Computer Science
  • 2009 Third International Conference on Digital Society
  • 2009
TLDR
This paper reviews studies of Wikipedia that have been published in peer-reviewed journals and major sub-streams of research covered include: how and why Wikipedia works; assessments of the reliability of its content; using it as a data source for various studies; and applications of Wikipedia in different domains of endeavour. Expand
Improving Wikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles
This study evaluates how well the authors of Wikipedia history articles adhere to the site’s policy of assuring verifiability through citations. It does so by examining the references and citationsExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...