“First do no harm” revisited

@article{Sokol2013FirstDN,
  title={“First do no harm” revisited},
  author={Daniel K. Sokol},
  journal={BMJ : British Medical Journal},
  year={2013},
  volume={347}
}
  • D. Sokol
  • Published 25 October 2013
  • Education
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
Following the dictum means balancing moral principles 
Ethical Issues Arising from the Prescription of Antipsychotic Medication in Clinical Forensic Settings
This chapter covers ethical issues requiring consideration when prescribing antipsychotic medications, with particular focus on prescribing that involves high-dose antipsychotics or polypharmacy.
Clinical Ethics in Historical Context, Part II
In the previous chapter, our discussion centered on the Hippocratic principles that undergird modern medical principlism, namely beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice, and the more
Should healthcare professionals sometimes allow harm? The case of self-injury
TLDR
It is argued that harm minimisation should be supported on the basis that it results in an overall reduction in harm when compared with more traditional ways of dealing with self-injurious behaviour.
Tribes of trust or distrust, 'attitude roots' and encouraging scientific participation in the tobacco harm-reduction debate.
  • L. Kozlowski
  • Medicine
    Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
  • 2021
Implications This commentary provides an analysis of non-scientific influences on the tobacco harm reduction debate. It makes use of the “attitude roots” model and the issue of misplace trust and
Medical Error: A Misnomer?
Error in health care might be felt to be avoided at all costs. But complex healthcare organisations cannot completely avoid error.
A Two-Pronged Approach to Understanding Quality and Safety Events at the Dental Office
TLDR
Patients Safety; Quality of Care; Dental Care; Case Reports; patient-centered Care; Patient-reported Outcomes; Patients- reported Outcomes.
Counterfactual harm
TLDR
The first statistical definition of harm and a framework for incorporating harm into algorithmic decisions are developed, arguing that harm is fundamentally a counterfactual quantity and that standard machine learning algorithms that cannot performcounterfactual reasoning are guaranteed to pursue harmful policies in certain environments.
First do no harm: counterfactual objective functions for safe & ethical AI
To act safely and ethically in the real world, agents must be able to reason about harm and avoid harmful actions. In this paper we develop the first statistical definition of harm and a framework for
Informed consent in evaluation: informed of what, exactly?
Australia’s 2007 National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research includes a requirement for informed consent from research participants. This paper discusses how the dynamics of bio-medical
First do no harm: using ‘ethical triage’ to minimise causing harm when undertaking educational research among vulnerable participants
ABSTRACT Although educational researchers will acknowledge that they have a moral imperative to avoid harming their participants whilst carrying out research, it does not necessarily mean that they
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
Philosophical medical ethics
TLDR
An Introduction to Philosophical Medical Ethics: The Arthur Case concludes with a discussion of the Arthur Case and some of the themes explored.
Bedside resource stewardship in disasters: a provider's dilemma practicing in an ethical gap.
  • M. Daniel
  • Medicine
    The Journal of clinical ethics
  • 2012
TLDR
A provider describes her experience allocating an oxygen tank in the intensive care unit at a hospital in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, immediately following the 2010 earthquake, and attempts to identify the factors that influenced her decision, opening up the factors for commentary and debate by an ethicist.