Corpus ID: 219570531

‘To Be and Not to Be: Philo on the Difference between Philosophers and Sophists’

@inproceedings{Adams2017ToBA,
  title={‘To Be and Not to Be: Philo on the Difference between Philosophers and Sophists’},
  author={S. Adams},
  year={2017}
}
  • S. Adams
  • Published 2017
  • This paper investigates the different ways that Philo depicts sophists and sophistry in his writings with particular attention to how he contrasts this group with philosophers and wisdom. I will begin by tracing the history of this comparison in Greek authors (e.g., Plato, Aristotle, Epictetus), the findings of which will be weighed against those of Philo to determine the similarities and differences between his characterisations and those of the wider literary tradition. Particular attention… CONTINUE READING

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
    Surprisingly, the sophistic nature of Balaam is not prominent these studies. This perspective is found more prominently in T. Seland, 'The Expository Use of the Balaam Figure in Philo's De Vita Mosis
    • SPhA
    • 2016
    The Jewish Philosophy": Reading Moses via Hellenistic Philosophy according to Philo
    • 2014
    For specific challenges to Winter and van Kooten, see E. Koskenniemi
    • Greeks, Jews, and Christians: Historical, Religious and Philological Studies in Honor of Jesús Peláez del Rosal
    • 2013
    The New Testament and Early Christian Literature in Greco-Roman Context: Studies in Honor of David E
    • Aune (NovTSup
    • 2006
    Philo's Version of Balaam
    • Henoch
    • 2003