‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia’s infrastructure and the gender gap

@article{Ford2017AnyoneCE,
  title={‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia’s infrastructure and the gender gap},
  author={Heather L Ford and Judy Wajcman},
  journal={Social Studies of Science},
  year={2017},
  volume={47},
  pages={511 - 527}
}
Feminist STS has long established that science’s provenance as a male domain continues to define what counts as knowledge and expertise. Wikipedia, arguably one of the most powerful sources of information today, was initially lauded as providing the opportunity to rebuild knowledge institutions by providing greater representation of multiple groups. However, less than ten percent of Wikipedia editors are women. At one level, this imbalance in contributions and therefore content is yet another… 
Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Wikipedia
Gender is one of the most pervasive and insidious forms of inequality. For example, English-language Wikipedia contains more than 1.5 million biographies about notable writers, inventors, and
The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: A Computational Approach to Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions
Wikipedia has a well-known gender divide affecting the diversity of the editor community and its biographical content. This bias not only shapes social perceptions of knowledge, but it can also
The Gender Divide in Wikipedia: Quantifying and Assessing the Impact of Two Feminist Interventions
Wikipedia has a well-known gender divide affecting its biographical content. This bias not only shapes social perceptions of knowledge, but it can also propagate beyond the platform as its contents
New maps for an inclusive Wikipedia: decolonial scholarship and strategies to counter systemic bias
ABSTRACT Since early in the development of the project, Wikipedia editors have been concerned with overcoming “systemic biases” in coverage of the world’s knowledge, especially those rooted in forms
Exploring the gender gap in the Spanish Wikipedia: Differences in engagement and editing practices
TLDR
This paper analyzes the Spanish Wikipedia with the aim of estimating the percentage of women editors and measuring their engagement and editing practices with respect to their men counterparts, and identifies a significant percentage of users whose gender cannot be determined by either method.
WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and Other Stories Wikipedia Tells Us: A Feminist Critique of Wikipedia’s Epistemology
Wikipedia has become increasingly prominent in online search results, serving as an initial path for the public to access “facts,” and lending plausibility to its autobiographical claim to be “the
The gender perspective in Wikipedia
Wikipedia is one of the most widely used information sources in the world. Although one of the guiding pillars of this digital platform is ensuring access to the diversity of human knowledge from a
Nitpicking online knowledge representations of governmental leadership. The case of Belgian prime ministers in Wikipedia and Wikidata.
TLDR
This article makes an evidence-based contribution to the study of the fundamental challenges that mark the formalisation of knowledge in the humanities by ‘nitpicking’ knowledge representations of governments and governmental leadership in Wikipedia and Wikidata.
Wikipedia and gender: The deleted, the marked, and the unpolluted biographies
Wikipedia is the self named free encyclopedia, available in more than 300 languages and one of the most popular websites on the Internet [12]. Despite its mission of collecting the sum of all
Representation and the problem of bibliographic imagination on Wikipedia
  • B. Luyt
  • Art
    Journal of Documentation
  • 2021
Purpose The astonishing thing about Wikipedia is that despite the way it is produced, the product is as good as it is and not far worse. But this is no reason for complacency. As others have
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Mind the skills gap: the role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia
Despite the egalitarian rhetoric surrounding online cultural production, profound gender inequalities remain in who contributes to one of the most visited Web sites worldwide, Wikipedia. In analyzing
Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions
TLDR
Data is used from an international survey of 176,192 readers, contributors, and former contributors to Wikipedia, including measures of demographics, education, motivation, and participation to examine the existence of the gender gap in contribution.
The nature of historical representation on Wikipedia: Dominant or alterative historiography?
  • B. Luyt
  • Sociology
    J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2011
TLDR
An analysis of the Wikipedia accounts of Singaporean and Philippine history suggests that a possible means to achieve something more of the promise of digital media for history is for information professionals to take a keener interest in Wikipedia, with an eye to helping include accounts of documented historical perspectives that are ignored by mainstream historiographical traditions.
"Writing up rather than writing down": becoming Wikipedia literate
TLDR
This work identifies and outlines several different literacy asymmetries and outlines what Darville refers to as the "background knowledges" required to be an empowered, literate member and applies this to the Wikipedia community.
‘Patches don’t have gender’: What is not open in open source software
While open source software development promises a fairer, more democratic model of software production often compared to a gift economy, it also is far more male dominated than other forms of
Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system
TLDR
This article analyses the sociotechnical system — the intricate collaboration between human users and automated content agents — that defines Wikipedia as a knowledge instrument.
Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica
Is there a bias in the against women’s representation in Wikipedia biographies? Thousands of biographical subjects, from six sources, are compared against the English-language Wikipedia and the
Reliable sources for indigenous knowledge: Dissecting Wikipedia's Catch-22.
This text is an unedited and preliminary version of a book chapter which will be published early 2014 in the Indigenous Knowledge Technology Conference (IKTC) 2011 post{conference book edited by Dr
The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia
TLDR
It is posited that the gendered and emotional labor required of many women to participate in Wikipedia's production renders it, problematically, a space of conflicting public and private spheres, motivated by antithetical open and closed values.
Uneven Geographies of User-Generated Information: Patterns of Increasing Informational Poverty
Geographies of codified knowledge have always been characterized by stark core–periphery patterns, with some parts of the world at the center of global voice and representation and many others
...
...