‘Am I rambling?’ on the advantages of interviewing couples together

@article{Bjrnholt2014AmIR,
  title={‘Am I rambling?’ on the advantages of interviewing couples together},
  author={Margunn Bj{\o}rnholt and Gunhild R. Farstad},
  journal={Qualitative Research},
  year={2014},
  volume={14},
  pages={19 - 3}
}
This article addresses a methodological controversy regarding the question of whether couples should ideally be interviewed together or apart. It draws on three different studies in which joint couple interviews were used either as the sole source of data or in combination with individual interviews. The authors focus on the specifics and strengths of joint couple interviews, and they argue that interviewing couples together has several advantages, such as solving the ethical problems of… 

Conducting Joint Interviews With Couples: Ethical and Methodological Challenges

TLDR
It is shown that joint interviews may become a site in which one partner silences the other and enacts symbolic violence, with the interviewer as unwilling abettor, or alternatively may facilitate passivity, resulting in partial and fragmented data.

Interviewing with or without the partner present?--an underexposed dilemma between ethics and methodology in nursing research.

TLDR
It is argued that the presence of the partner during an interview session might influence the data and favour expressions of shared rather than individual experiences of the phenomenon studied, and ethical concerns must be given higher priority than methodology when interviewing couples.

The Couple Interview as a Method of Collecting Data in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Studies

The aim of this article is to discuss the couple interview as a method of collecting data in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) studies. This study was conducted in Gauteng, South Africa,

Conducting dyadic, relational research about endometriosis: A reflexive account of methods, ethics and data analysis

TLDR
It is argued that utilising separate interviews with dyadic analysis rather than conducting joint interviews offers considerable methodological benefits, and allows a unique relational insight into the impact of chronic illness on couples and how they navigate chronic illness.

Holistic Experiences and Strategies for Conducting Research With Couples

TLDR
methodological considerations for conducting research interviews with couples are outlined, addressing four key areas which span elements across the research project journey: (a) choosing a mode of interview, (b) ethical concerns in couple research, (c) the interview as a platform for disclosure, and (d) analyzing data from couple research.

Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value

TLDR
It is suggested that joint interviews are a particularly appropriate method for studying complex shared practices such as making health decisions, and a cautious defense of the often-tacit assumption that the “naturalness" of joint interviews strengthens their credibility as the basis for analytic inferences.

The Invisible Influences Behind Joint Interviews: An Examination of Relational Expectations and Technology Use

  • J. Campbell
  • Sociology
    American Journal of Qualitative Research
  • 2021
This paper presents a reflexive account of how the use of joint interviews with romantic dyads creates a unique conversational space for people to reflect on relational practices that are often

“You couldn’t ask for more really”: A relational perspective of doing and un-doing jointness using individual alongside couple interviews of home birth

The purpose of this article is to discuss the methodological advantage of a dyadic approach to researching home birth. It is based on a study in which a combination of pre and post, conjoint and

Doing it with couples: the chattiness of the social revisited

The article rehabilitates the joint couple interview as a research instrument for creating data about modern intimate relationships. It refutes the reservations against data retrieved from the
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES

Doing household research: interviewing couples together and apart

Summary The question of whether household members should be interviewed together or apart is hotly debated in ‘family’ studies. In this paper, I use my own experiences of both methods of interviewing

Revisiting an experimental research project for gender equality in the family

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline the background as well as methodological and epistemological aspects to, and the effects of, a follow-up study 30 years later of the work-sharing

InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing

List of Boxes, Figures, and Tables Preface to the Third Edition Acknowledgments About the Author Introduction 1. Introduction to Interview Research Conversation as Research Three Interview Sequences

“Doing Gender”

Abstract Through thinking about and empirically analyzing lesbigay domestic arrangements in Sweden, this paper aims at broadening the understanding of gender and further developing the “doing gender”

Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods

PART ONE: CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO DEPTH INTERVIEWING Interview 'Facts' as Evidence to Support Inferences to Eventual Theorization/Representation Models Conceptual Frameworks for Studying and

Norwegian work‐sharing couples project 30 years later

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline the background as well as methodological and epistemological aspects to, and the effects of, a follow‐up study 30 years later of the work‐sharing

How men became the local agents of change towards gender equality

The Work-Sharing Couples Study was an action research project conducted in the early 1970s to reconcile work, family and gender equality in families. Its design involved both spouses working

Displaying Families

This article argues that the sociology of contemporary family relationships should be developed to recognize the importance of ‘displaying’ as well as ‘doing’ family. The addition of the concept of

Part‐time work and the career and life choices of the men from the work‐sharing couples study

Purpose – This article outlines the longitudinal consequences for men who participated in the work‐sharing couples study which was a Norwegian, experimental research project in the early 1970s. The

Classed parental practices in a modern welfare state: Caring for the under threes in Norway

This paper deals with aspects of social class within the modern welfare state of Norway. More specifically, it explores how universal family policy measures are understood and combined by parents in