Śamkara's principle and two ontomystical arguments

@article{Pruss2001amkarasPA,
  title={Śamkara's principle and two ontomystical arguments},
  author={A. Pruss},
  journal={International Journal for Philosophy of Religion},
  year={2001},
  volume={49},
  pages={111-120}
}
  • A. Pruss
  • Published 2001
  • Philosophy
  • International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
L'A. traite de la philosophie de Sankara sur le monde exterieur comme apparence et cherche a montrer comment elle peut etre uilisee comme nouvel argument pour l'existence de Dieu en combinant l'argument ontologique de Plantiga et l'experience mystique. 
The ontomystical argument revisited
I argue that Alexander Pruss’s ontomystical arguments should not be endorsed without further argumentative support of their premises. My specific targets are his claims that (i) Śamkara’s principleExpand
A defense of modal appearances
I argue that beliefs about what appears possible are justified in much the same way as beliefs about what appears actual. I do so by chisholming, and then modalizing, the epistemic principleExpand
The ontological argument and the motivational centres of lives
Abstract Assuming S5, the main controversial premise in modal ontological arguments is the possibility premise, such as that possibly a maximally great being exists. I shall offer a new way ofExpand