Corpus ID: 23901248

[Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: a comparison of SCP- and theta/beta-protocols].

  title={[Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: a comparison of SCP- and theta/beta-protocols].},
  author={U. Leins and T. Hinterberger and S. Kaller and F. Schober and Cornelia Weber and U. Strehl},
  journal={Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie},
  volume={55 5},
  • U. Leins, T. Hinterberger, +3 authors U. Strehl
  • Published 2006
  • Medicine
  • Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
  • Research groups have consistently reported on behavioral and cognitive improvements of children with ADHD after neurofeedback. However, neurofeedback has not been commonly accepted as a treatment for ADHD. This is due, in part, to several methodological limitations. The neurofeedback literature is further complicated by having several different training protocols. Differences between the clinical efficacy of such protocols have not been examined. This study addresses previous methodological… CONTINUE READING

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Neurofeedback in ADHD: Further Pieces of the Puzzle
    • 67
    • PDF
    Learning curves of theta/beta neurofeedback in children with ADHD
    • 23
    • PDF


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    Neurofeedback Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children: A Comparison with Methylphenidate
    • 421
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Neurofeedback Combined with Training in Metacognitive Strategies: Effectiveness in Students with ADD
    • 209
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Neurofeedback as a Treatment for ADHD: A Methodological Review with Implications for Future Research
    • 90
    • Highly Influential
    The Effects of Stimulant Therapy, EEG Biofeedback, and Parenting Style on the Primary Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    • 342
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study.
    • 334
    • PDF