[Are the tools recommended by ASPEN and ESPEN comparable for assessing the nutritional status?].

@article{Valero2005AreTT,
  title={[Are the tools recommended by ASPEN and ESPEN comparable for assessing the nutritional status?].},
  author={Maria Angeles Valero and Laura Mar{\'i}a D{\'i}ez and N El Kadaoui and Alberto Escalada Jimenez and Herminia Rodr{\'i}guez and M Doris Le{\'o}n},
  journal={Nutricion hospitalaria},
  year={2005},
  volume={20 4},
  pages={259-67}
}
INTRODUCTION [corrected] There is no "gold standard" for identification of malnutrition. The ASPEN board of directors (2002) suggest the subjective global assessment (SGA) and ESPEN (2002) recommend the nutritional risk screening-2002 (NRS-2002) to detect the prevalence of malnutrition. AIMS This cross-sectional study aims (1) to assess the prevalence of malnutrition on admission and (2) to know association between two tools used to evaluate nutritional risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS 135… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
10 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…