[Are SPA therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy effective for chronic neck pain? Randomised clinical trial. Second part: medicoeconomic approach].

@article{Forestier2007AreST,
  title={[Are SPA therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy effective for chronic neck pain? Randomised clinical trial. Second part: medicoeconomic approach].},
  author={Romain J Forestier and Alain Françon and F Saint Arroman and Christiane Bertolino and Bernard Graber-Duvernay and Alexandre Guillemot and M Slikh},
  journal={Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique},
  year={2007},
  volume={50 3},
  pages={148-53}
}
UNLABELLED We report the results of a cost-effectiveness evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and spa therapy (ST) versus usual care (control) for chronic neck pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria were age 18 to 80 years with pain in the neck area of more than 3 months' duration and no contraindications for PEMF therapy and… CONTINUE READING