"New" And "Old" Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?

  title={"New" And "Old" Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?},
  author={Stathis N. Kalyvas},
  journal={World Politics},
  pages={118 - 99}
This article questions the prevalent argument that civil wars have fundamentally changed since the end of the cold war. According to this argument, "new" civil wars are different from "old" civil wars along at least three related dimensions--they are caused and motivated by private predation rather than collective grievances and ideological concerns; the parties to these conflicts lack popular support and must rely on coercion; and gratuitous, barbaric violence is dispensed against civilian… Expand

Tables from this paper

New Wars, New Morality?
Has war fundamentally changed? If so, it may be time for reconsidering accepted moral standards for waging wars and for conduct in war. The new war thesis holds that wars have fundamentally alteredExpand
Deconstructing civil wars
The identification of intra-national armed conflict as a leading problem for the international community in the 1990s produced a wave of novel research into civil wars. Though these new civil warExpand
The Conception of the “New Wars”: a Question of Validity
Abstract This article analyses the concept of the “new wars”, especially the claim of its authors that conventional interstate war is no longer viable, as the nature of organized violence has changedExpand
In Defence of New Wars
This article reviews the literature on ‘new wars’. It argues that ‘new wars’ should be understood not as an empirical category but rather as a way of elucidating the logic of contemporary war thatExpand
Are ‘New Wars’ More Atrocious? Battle Severity, Civilians Killed and Forced Migration Before and After the End of the Cold War
It is widely believed that the human impact of civil conflict in the present era is especially destructive. Proponents of the ‘new wars’ thesis hold that today’s conflicts are fuelled by exclusiveExpand
Reading Schmitt against Schmitt in the Context of the "New Wars" Debate
This article argues that the concept of new wars represents the ontological fear of the unfamiliar other after the end of the Cold War. While reviewing Carl Schmitt’s arguments in the Theory ofExpand
The asymmetric war discourse and its moral economies: a critique
Contemporary military conflicts are frequently referred to as ‘new’, ‘irregular’, or ‘asymmetric’, labels that are meant to distinguish contemporary conflict formations from previous ones. Yet theExpand
POLS3203 Major Essay! ! 1 Since the end of the Cold War, the outbreak of a succession of bloody, intractable civil conflicts throughout the world has prompted various authors to theorise theExpand
The aim of this chapter is threefold. First, I argue that the study of civil wars must incorporate a solid theoretical understanding of warfare; second, I introduce a distinction between threeExpand
The New Wars? The Cognitive Turn and Its Implications.
The “New Wars” Debate Since some armed conflicts newly occurred during the 1990s, the word “new wars” becomes fashionable (Gray, 1997; Kaldor, 2006(1998); Snow, 1996). After September 11 incident,Expand


New and Old Wars : Organized Violence in a Global Era
Mary Kaldor's New and Old Wars has fundamentally changed the way both scholars and policy-makers understand contemporary war and conflict. In the context of globalization, this path-breaking book hasExpand
The economic functions of violence in civil wars (special issue)
The persistence and brutality of contemporary civil wars have left many analysts puzzled. Traditional interpretations describe civil wars as simple confrontations between two sides, as explosions ofExpand
Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature
Theorists of ethnic conflict have argued that the physical separation of warring ethnic groups may be the only possible solution to civil war. They argue that without territorial partition and, ifExpand
Post-Modern Conflict: Warlords, Post-Adjustment States and Private Protection
This paper provides a critical alternative to two key aspects of conventional wisdom in international policy. First, the prevailing notion of internal or intra‐state war as bounded by traditionalExpand
Internal war: causes and cures.
Since the end of the cold war internal conflicts have received unprecedented attention. Of special interest has been the effort of neorealists to employ an approach traditionally used to explainExpand
I use a rationalist framework to explore an issue typically framed and understood as irrational: large-scale violence against civilians in the context of civil wars. More specifically, I focus on theExpand
Liberia 1989-1994 : a study of ethnic and spiritual violence
This article deals with the civil war which broke out in Liberia on 24 December 1989, when 100 or more fighters claiming allegiance to the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL), led by CharlesExpand
The Banality of Ethnic War
In this article I assess the violence that took place in the former Yugoslavia and in Rwanda in the 1990s and argue that the whole concept of “ethnic warfare” may be severely misguided. Speciacally,Expand
The Mask of Anarchy: The Destruction of Liberia and the Religious Dimension of an African Civil War
Liberia has been one of Africa's most violent trouble spots. In 1990, when thousands of teenage fighters, including young men wearing women's clothing and bizarre objects of decoration, laid siege toExpand
The Culture of Civil War in Kyoto
How do ordinary people respond to prolonged terror? The convulsion of Japan's "Warring States" period between 1467 and 1568 destroyed the medieval order and exposed the framework of an early modernExpand