"I'm just being honest." When and why honesty enables help versus harm.

@article{Levine2020ImJB,
  title={"I'm just being honest." When and why honesty enables help versus harm.},
  author={Emma E. Levine and David Mauricio Munguia Gomez},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={2020}
}
Although honesty is typically conceptualized as a virtue, it often conflicts with other equally important moral values, such as avoiding interpersonal harm. In the present research, we explore when and why honesty enables helpful versus harmful behavior. Across 5 incentive-compatible experiments in the context of advice-giving and economic games, we document four central results. First, honesty enables selfish harm: people are more likely to engage in and justify selfish behavior when… 
View on PubMed
doi.org
2 Citations

2 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Personality and behavioral dishonesty.
  • B. Hilbig
  • Psychology
    Current opinion in psychology
  • 2022
Deception and the marketplace of ideas

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty
Deception: The Role of Consequences
Deception is part of many economic interactions. Business people, politicians, diplomats, lawyers, and students in the experimental laboratory who make use of private information do not always do so…
The Surprising Costs of Silence: Asymmetric Preferences for Prosocial Lies of Commission and Omission
TLDR
It is demonstrated that communicators and targets make egocentric moral judgments of deception, which have psychological and practical implications for medicine, management, behavioral ethics, and human communication.
Difficult conversations: navigating the tension between honesty and benevolence.
Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior
The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff
The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
TLDR
The results suggest that perceiving harm in immorality is intuitive and does not require effortful rationalization, and argues against both standard interpretations of moral dumbfounding and domain-specific theories of morality that assume the psychological existence of harmless wrongs.
The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
  • Chelsea Schein, Kurt Gray
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2018
TLDR
It is argued that harm should be redefined as an intuitively perceived continuum, and this redefinition provides a new understanding of moral content and mechanism—the constructionist Theory of Dyadic Morality.
Self-Serving Altruism? The Lure of Unethical Actions that Benefit Others.
Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness
TLDR
Experimental evidence is provided, using economic game experiments, that people engage in uncalculating cooperation to signal that they can be relied upon to cooperate in the future, the first empirical evidence, to the knowledge, that uncalculated cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness.
...
...