"Every coin has two sides": The effects of dialectical thinking and attitudinal ambivalence on psychological discomfort and consumer choice

  title={"Every coin has two sides": The effects of dialectical thinking and attitudinal ambivalence on psychological discomfort and consumer choice},
  author={Jun Pang and Hean Tat Keh and Xiuping Li and Durairaj Maheswaran},
  journal={Journal of Consumer Psychology},

Figures and Tables from this paper

The role of dialecticism in objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence.
Across studies, greater dialectical thinking was associated with holding both positive and negative evaluations of the same topic and weaker correlations between objective ambivalence and subjective reports of being conflicted (subjective ambivalences).
Attitudinal ambivalence: Origins and coping strategies
: Attitudinal ambivalence refers to the co-existence of positive and negative evaluations and feelings of attitude toward to an object. Recent studies of the domain investigated the origin of
Modeling attitude ambivalence and behavioral outcomes from hotel reviews
This study aims to offer a conceptual framework that elaborates on how tourists’ perception of contradictory features in reviews’ factuality and comprehension – within a single hotel review and
Mixed feelings: the case of ambivalence
The role of attitude ambivalence in conflicting online hotel reviews
ABSTRACT Conflicting online reviews, an under-researched area, have gained significant interest among readers. We develop a research model of conflicting online hotel reviews that lead to consumers’
Effects of service encounter barriers on situational abnormality and consumers' behavioral intentions at food and beverage restaurants
PurposeThe present study unveils the service encounter barriers – interactional and instructional – faced by foreign consumers at food and beverage restaurants in China. It builds a conceptual


Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?
The relation between conflicting evaluations of attitude objects (potential ambivalence) and associated unpleasant feelings (felt ambivalences) was investigated and similarities of ambivalent and cognitive dissonance constructs are discussed.
On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique.
This article explores the alternate meanings of attitudinal neutrality in the context of the bipolarity-reciprocal antagonism issue. Specifically, it proposes a modification of the semantic
Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆
Abstract We hypothesize that, when encountering a new or unfamiliar attitude object that has both positiveandnegative attributes, such evaluatively inconsistent information leads toattitudinal
The Dialectical Self-Concept: Contradiction, Change, and Holism in East Asian Cultures
Naïve dialecticism provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding cultural differences and the contradictory, changeable, and holistic nature of the East Asian self-concept.
Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.
Chinese ways of dealing with seeming contradictions result in a dialectical or compromise approach—retaining basic elements of opposing perspectives by seeking a "middle way." On the other hand,
When Racial Ambivalence Evokes Negative Affect, Using a Disguised Measure of Mood
Many White people simultaneously hold both sympathetic and antagonistic attitudes toward Blacks. The present research found that activation of these conflicted racial attitudes gives rise to
Coping with Ambivalence: The Effect of Removing a Neutral Option on Consumer Attitude and Preference Judgments
This article examines how the exclusion of a neutral or fence-sitting option changes an expressed attitude or preference judgment. Over a series of six studies, we find that the exclusion of a
The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence.
This research examined the relationship between the measured and manipulated positive and negative bases of attitudes and the psychological experience of attitudinal ambivalence and the gradual threshold model of ambivalences was advanced.