"Effective systematicity" in, "effective systematicity" out: a reply to Edelman and Intrator (2003)

@article{Hummel2003EffectiveSI,
  title={"Effective systematicity" in, "effective systematicity" out: a reply to Edelman and Intrator (2003)},
  author={John E. Hummel},
  journal={Cognitive Science},
  year={2003},
  volume={27},
  pages={327-329}
}
Letter to the Editor " Effective systematicity " in, " effective systematicity " out: a reply to Edelman and Intrator (2003) Edelman and Intrator (2003) claim that their " what + where " representation is effectively systematic, which is meant to imply that the CoF model overcomes the inability of view-based models to account for the human capacity to represent and process spatial relations—a limitation pointed out in Hummel (2000). However, the claim that the CoF is " systematic " is… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
4 Citations
6 References
Similar Papers

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…