Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
Exploring the enactment effect from an information processing view: what can we learn from serial position analyses?
TLDR
Analyses of processes that determine the enactment and age effect in a multi-trial free recall paradigm by looking at the serial position effects show that encoding by enacting seems to profit especially from remembering the last items of a presented list.
View on PubMed
Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing
TLDR
It is found that multitasking taxes concurrent coordinate, but not categorical, spatial processing and males showed a better multitasking performance than females, providing novel experimental evidence for the hypothesis that efficient multitasking involves metric relational processing.
View on Springer
The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior
View on Elsevier
Effects of Testing and Enactment on Memory
Learning occurs not only when we encode information but also when we test our memory for this information at a later time. In three empirical studies, I investigated the individual and combined eff…
Individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases.
TLDR
Less-than-additive effects of enactment and testing on the rate of forgetting, as well as on long-term retention, support the notion that both study techniques effectively promote item-specific processing that can only be marginally increased further by combining them.
View on PubMed
Test-potentiated learning of motor sequences
TLDR
Performance was better for restudied items that were previously cued for retrieval as compared to items that had been restudies without prior retrieval, but no such indirect testing benefit occurred when initial and final testing formats were incongruent.
View on Taylor & Francis
How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
TLDR
To conclude, overt testing was more beneficial for later retention than covert testing, but the effect size was small.
View on Springer
The Direct Testing Effect Is Pervasive in Action Memory: Analyses of Recall Accuracy and Recall Speed
TLDR
Repeated retrieval practice, relative to repeated restudy and study-only practice, reduced the recall decrement over the long delay, and enhanced phrases’ recall speed already after 2 min, and this independently of type of encoding and recall test.
View on PubMed
The enactment effect in a multi-trial free-recall paradigm
Recent evidence suggests that enacting compared to reading action phrases during encoding increases item-specific processing, but hampers “retrieval” (i.e. processes uniquely required in a…
View on Taylor & Francis
Putting action memory to the test: testing affects subsequent restudy but not long-term forgetting of action events
ABSTRACT Testing memory typically enhances subsequent re-encoding of information (“indirect” testing effect) and, as compared to restudy, it also benefits later long-term retention (“direct” testing…
View on Taylor & Francis
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License