• Publications
  • Influence
Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
Objectives To see whether telling peer reviewers that their signed reviews of original research papers might be posted on the BMJ’s website would affect the quality of their reviews. DesignExpand
  • 102
  • 5
  • PDF
Founding principles
  • T. Delamothe
  • Medicine
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
  • 29 May 2008
Inthe first in a series ofarticles marking the 60th anniversary of the foundation of the NHS, Tony Delamothe examines what drove its formation
  • 42
  • 5
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing
TLDR
The following statements of principle were drafted during a one-day meeting held on April 11, 2003 at the headquarters of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland. Expand
  • 141
  • 4
Of intended and unintended consequences
  • T. Delamothe
  • Medicine
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
  • 27 October 2010
If you can judge a society by how well it treats its weakest members (the criterion variously credited to Aristotle, Churchill, Dostoevsky, Gandhi, and Pope John Paul II) how will Britain’s BigExpand
  • 24
  • 4
Statistics today.
We may not be able to make you love reading, but statistics today will lead you to love reading starting from now. Book is the window to open the new world. The world that you want is in the betterExpand
  • 9
  • 4
Universality, equity, and quality of care
  • T. Delamothe
  • Medicine
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
  • 5 June 2008
Sixty years on, the NHS is still struggling to ensure equal access to the best care. In the second article in his series, Tony Delamothe examines the difficulties
  • 24
  • 3
The quality of health information on the internet
This week's theme issue attempts to provide a framework for thinking about the quality of health information on the internet—a source of anxiety almost since its first appearance. Five years agoExpand
  • 263
  • 2
Adequacy of authors’ replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
Objective To investigate whether substantive criticism in electronic letters to the editor, defined as a problem that could invalidate the research or reduce its reliability, is adequately addressedExpand
  • 24
  • 2
  • PDF
Looking at the pictures.
perform badly and then punishes (or even retrains) us. Furthermore, quality is a banner that all are willing to rally round. Despite these attractions health workers have been even slower thanExpand
  • 38
  • 2
  • PDF