Stephane A. Regnier

Learn More
OBJECTIVE Compare the efficacy of ranibizumab, aflibercept, laser, and sham in the first-line treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) to inform technology assessments such as those conducted by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, congress abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov registry(More)
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of approved treatments for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of approved treatments for macular oedema secondary to BRVO were identified from an updated systematic review. SETTING A Bayesian network(More)
BACKGROUND Ranibizumab and aflibercept are alternative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents approved for the treatment of visual impairment (VI) due to diabetic macular edema (DME). OBJECTIVE To estimate, from a UK healthcare perspective, the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat and extend (T&E)(More)
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline characteristics on visual outcome of patients with diabetic macular edema and compare the results of clinical trials with different patient populations. METHODS A model was created with patient-level data from the RESPOND/RESTORE trials to estimate the impact of baseline(More)
  • 1