• Publications
  • Influence
Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?
Much research in the last two decades has demonstrated that human responses deviate from the performance deemed normative according to various models of decision making and rational judgment (e.g.,Expand
  • 2,085
  • 147
  • PDF
Exposure to print and orthographic processing.
  • 855
  • 58
Practitioner review: do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?
BACKGROUND Both performance-based and rating measures are commonly used to index executive function in clinical and neuropsychological assessments. They are intended to index the same broadExpand
  • 628
  • 54
  • PDF
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leadsExpand
  • 623
  • 49
  • PDF
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
A sample of 349 college students completed an argument evaluation test (AET) in which they evaluated arguments concerning real-life situations. A separate regression analysis was conducted for eachExpand
  • 500
  • 47
  • PDF
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
In 7 different studies, the authors observed that a large number of thinking biases are uncorrelated with cognitive ability. These thinking biases include some of the most classic and well-studiedExpand
  • 600
  • 41
  • PDF
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leadsExpand
  • 375
  • 40
  • PDF
Individual differences in rational thought.
Much research in the last 2 decades has demonstrated that humans deviate from normative models of decision making and rational judgment. In 4 studies involving 954 participants, the authors exploredExpand
  • 661
  • 31
  • PDF
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Much research in the last two decades has demonstrated that human responses deviate from the performance deemed normative according to various models of decision making and rational judgment (e.g.,Expand
  • 1,293
  • 22
On priming by a sentence context.
  • 489
  • 17
...
1
2
3
4
5
...