Learn More
Recently, speech researchers have begun to base spectral analyses of sibilant fricatives on modern spectral estima-tors that promise reduced error in the estimation of the spectrum of the acoustic waveform. In this paper we look at the effect that the choice of spectral estimator has on the estimation of spectral properties of English voiceless sibilant(More)
PURPOSE Four measures of children's developing robustness of phonological contrast were compared to see how they correlated with age, vocabulary size, and adult listeners' correctness ratings. METHOD Word-initial sibilant fricative productions from eighty-one 2- to 5-year-old children and 20 adults were phonetically transcribed and acoustically analyzed.(More)
This paper reports preliminary results of a study of the development of sibilant fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ in young children. Results show that transcribed accuracy increased over the age range studied (28 to 39 months) and that children with larger vocabularies produced fricatives more accurately than ones with smaller vocabularies. Spectral characteristics(More)
The English sibilant fricatives /s/ and /S/ are acquired late by normal hearing (NH) children, and pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users lag even further behind their NH peers. Previous work on the acquisition of sibilant fricatives by children with CIs has focused on their performance relative to NH controls, but the developmental trajectory of their(More)
OBJECTIVES Previous research has found that relative to their peers with normal hearing (NH), children with cochlear implants (CIs) produce the sibilant fricatives /s/ and /∫/ less accurately and with less subphonemic acoustic contrast. The present study sought to further investigate these differences across groups in two ways. First, subphonemic acoustic(More)
Objectives: Previous research has found that relative to their peers with normal hearing (NH), children with cochlear implants (CIs) produce the sibilant fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ less accurately and with less subphonemic acoustic contrast. The present study sought to further investigate these differences across groups in two ways. First, subphonemic acoustic(More)
  • 1