Fits to high energy data alone cannot cleanly discriminate between asymptotic ln s and ln 2 s behavior of total hadronic cross sections. We demonstrate that this is no longer true when we requireâ€¦ (More)

Using an eikonal analysis, we simultaneously fit a QCD-inspired parameterization of all accelerator data on forward proton-proton and antiproton-proton scattering amplitudes, together with cosmic rayâ€¦ (More)

Using an eikonal analysis, we examine the validity of the factorization theorem for nucleon-nucleon, Î³p and Î³Î³ collisions. As an example, using the additive quark model and meson vector dominance, weâ€¦ (More)

The status of hadron-hadron interactions is reviewed, with emphasis on the forward and near-forward scattering regions. Using unitarity, the optical theorem is derived. Analyticity and crossingâ€¦ (More)

In the real world, experimental data are rarely, if ever, distributed as a normal (Gaussian) distribution. As an example, a large set of dataâ€”such as the cross sections for particle scattering as aâ€¦ (More)

A high-resolution Î±, x-ray, and Î³-ray coincidence spectroscopy experiment was conducted at the GSI Helmholtzzentrum fÃ¼r Schwerionenforschung. Thirty correlated Î±-decay chains were detected followingâ€¦ (More)

We fit the reduced cross section for deep-inelastic electron scattering data to a three parameter ln2s fit, A + beta ln2(s/s0), where s = (Q2/x)(1-x) + m2, and Q2 is the virtuality of the exchangedâ€¦ (More)

We show that the data on Î³p and Î³Î³ interactions can be derived from the pp and pÌ„p forward scattering amplitudes using vector meson dominance and the additive quark model. The nucleonâ€“nucleon dataâ€¦ (More)

Using repeated Laplace transforms, we turn coupled, integral-differential singlet DGLAP equations into NLO (next-to-leading) coupled algebraic equations, which we then decouple. After two Laplaceâ€¦ (More)

Landshoff and Donnachie[hep/ph 0509240, (2005)] parametrize the energy behavior of pp and ppÌ„ scattering cross sections with five parameters, using: Ïƒ = 56.08s + 21.70s for pp, (1) Ïƒ = 98.39s +â€¦ (More)