Margaret Wetherell

Learn More
We contrast two theoretical approaches to social influence, one stressing interpersonal dependence, conceptualized as normative and informational influence (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955), and the other stressing group membership, conceptualized as self-categorization and referent informational influence (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher & Wetherell, 1987). We argue(More)
This study used a discursive approach to analysing doctors' and nurses' accounts of men's health in the context of general practice. The analysis worked intensively with interview material from a small sample of general practitioners and their nursing colleagues. We examine the contradictory discursive framework through which this sample made sense of their(More)
The Open University's repository of research publications and other research outputs The discursive climate of singleness: the consequences for women's negotiation of a single identity Journal Article How to cite: Reynolds, Jill and Wetherell, Margaret (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: the consequences for women's negotiation of a single(More)
  • Book Chapter, Rachel Thomson, Mary Kehily, Hadfield, Lucy, Sharpe +6 others
  • 2012
Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. Introduction The increasing participation of women in further and higher education and the labour force since the(More)
Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. Abstract This article presents a discursive analysis of interview material in which single women reflect on their(More)
  • Derek Edwards, Malcolm Ashmore, Jonathan Potter, Michael Billig, David Middleton, Alan Radley +1 other
  • 2003
and participants in the 15th Discourse and Reflexivity Workshop (University of Sheffield, September 1992) for making helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. In this version pages are counted according to the published numbers with breaks following the published version.
  • 1