• Publications
  • Influence
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016
TLDR
Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality. Expand
Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region — Case Series
TLDR
During the first 3 weeks of the Covid-19 outbreak in the Seattle area, the most common reasons for admission to the ICU were hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to mechanical ventilation, hypotension requiring vasopressor treatment, or both. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016
TLDR
Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
TLDR
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign CO VID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19, and will provide new recommendations in further releases of these guidelines. Expand
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update
TLDR
In response to the publication of “Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016” [12, 13], a revised “hour-1 bundle” has been developed and is presented below. Expand
Clinical Management of Ebola Virus Disease in the United States and Europe.
TLDR
Among the patients with EVD who were cared for in the United States or Europe, close monitoring and aggressive supportive care that included intravenous fluid hydration, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, nutritional support, and critical care management for respiratory and renal failure were needed; 81.5% of these patients who received this care survived. Expand
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study)
TLDR
Patients whose care included compliance with all of the evidence-based bundle metrics had a 40 % reduction in the odds of dying in hospital with the 3-h bundle and 36 % for the 6-h bundles. Expand
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update.
INTRODUCTIONThe “sepsis bundle” has been central to the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) from the first publication of its evidence-based guidelines in 2004 through subsequentExpand
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
TLDR
While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression ofSepsis. Expand
Barriers to end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: perceptions vary by level of training, discipline, and institution.
TLDR
It was found that perceived barriers to EOL care differed significantly by level of training, discipline and institution, suggesting the interventions to improve Eol care may need to be locally targeted and specific tolevel of training and discipline. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...