Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: revisiting the "affect-free" claim of terror management research.
TLDR
This work proposes that the MS manipulation can, in fact, produce significant and meaningful changes in affect once one employs the appropriate measures and experimental design, and reports 4 experiments, each of which demonstrates reliable activation of negative affect, especially with respect to fear-/terror-related sentiments.
View on PubMed
Clarifying values: an updated review
TLDR
Values clarification methods may improve decision-making processes and potentially more distal outcomes, but the small number of evaluations and the heterogeneity in outcome measures makes it difficult to determine their overall effectiveness or the specific characteristics that increase effectiveness.
View on Springer
Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: an integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion.
TLDR
The authors discuss the relevance of the present findings for theory and research across a variety of different theoretical and methodological paradigms, including social psychological models of threat, emotional appraisal models, and the political science literature.
View on PubMed
Development of the Medical Maximizer-Minimizer Scale.
TLDR
A new measure is proposed and validates that captures the extent to which individuals are "medical maximizers" who are predisposed to seek health care even for minor problems, versus "medical minimizer" who prefer to avoid medical intervention unless it is necessary.
View on PubMed
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders
TLDR
Key concepts that influence the decision making process itself and that may change what it means to make a good decision are described: interpersonal factors, structural constraints, affective influences, and values clarification methods.
View on Springer
Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods
TLDR
Developers of values clarification methods should carefully consider each of the design features in this taxonomy of design features and publish adequate descriptions of their designs.
View on SAGE
Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statistics.
View on PubMed
Can the vaccine adverse event reporting system be used to increase vaccine acceptance and trust?
View on PubMed
Contrast effects in priming paradigms: Implications for theory and research on implicit attitudes.
TLDR
A response-mapping framework is proposed and validated, which provides insight into some longstanding ambiguities in the priming literature and implications for theories of contrast and models of evaluative priming are discussed.
View on PubMed
Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions
TLDR
Patients’ treatment decisions were based largely on urologists’ recommendations, which, in turn, were based on medical factors and not on patients’ personal views of the relative pros and cons of treatment alternatives.
View on SAGE
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License