• Publications
  • Influence
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
TLDR
A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
TLDR
The PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISma 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews are presented.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to
CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
TLDR
An international group of experts has created a guideline to improve the transparency, accuracy, completeness, and frequency of documented systematic review and meta-analysis protocols—PRISMA-P (for protocols) 2015.
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
TLDR
This paper presents the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where it is presented why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
TLDR
The PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISma 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews are presented.
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
TLDR
Investigation of the epidemiological and reporting characteristics of a more recent cross-section of SRs suggests that more than 8,000 SRs are being indexed in MEDLINE annually, corresponding to a 3-fold increase over the last decade.
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
TLDR
This review updates the earlier systematic review assessing whether journal endorsement of the 1996 and 2001 CONSORT checklists influences the completeness of reporting of RCTs published in medical journals.
...
...