Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
Forecasting Decisions in Conflict Situations: A Comparison of Game Theory, Role-playing, and Unaided Judgement
View via Publisher
Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility Policies
View on SSRN
Golden Rule of Forecasting: Be Conservative
This paper proposes a unifying theory of forecasting in the form of a Golden Rule of Forecasting. The Golden Rule is to be conservative. A conservative forecast is consistent with cumulative…
View on SSRN
Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared
TLDR
It is considered that Delphi is greatly under-utilized, and the reasoning provided as an output of the Delphi process is likely to be reassuring to forecast users who are uncomfortable with the “black box” nature of prediction markets.
View via Publisher
Forecasting methods and principles: Evidence-based checklists
TLDR
Findings from a review of forecasting experiments were used to identify methods and principles that lead to accurate forecasts and checklists to help forecasters and their clients undertake and commission studies that adhere to principles and use valid methods were developed.
View on Taylor & Francis
Competitor-Oriented Objectives: Myth of Market Share
Competitor-oriented objectives, such as market-share targets, are promoted by academics and are commonly used by firms. A 1996 review of the evidence, summarized in this paper, found that…
View on SSRN
Structured Analogies for Forecasting
TLDR
This work compared structured analogies with unaided judgments for predicting the decisions made in eight conflict situations and found that among experts who were independently able to think of two or more analogies and who had direct experience with their closest analogy, 60% of forecasts were accurate.
View via Publisher
Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgement for forecasting decisions in conflicts: further evidence
View via Publisher
The Ombudsman: Value of Expertise for Forecasting Decisions in Conflicts
TLDR
It is concluded that expert judgment should not be used for predicting decisions that people will make in conflicts because decision makers ask experts for their opinions and are likely to overlook other, more useful, approaches.
View on SSRN
Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Disclaimers in Advertising
The authors find no evidence that consumers benefit from government-mandated disclaimers in advertising. Experiments and common experience show that admonishments to change or avoid behaviors often…
View on SAGE
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License