Author pages are created from data sourced from our academic publisher partnerships and public sources.
- Publications
- Influence
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- J. P. Higgins, D. Altman, +7 authors J. Sterne
- Medicine
- BMJ : British Medical Journal
- 18 October 2011
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for… Expand
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the 2010 version of the CONSORT Statement, which updates the previous reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulated experience.
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting… Expand
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
- D. Moher, S. Hopewell, +6 authors D. Altman
- Medicine
- International journal of surgery
- 2012
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial… Expand
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
The RCT is a very beautiful technique, of wide applicability, but as with everything else there are snags. When humans have to make observations there is always the possibility of bias (1).… Expand
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
- D. Moher, S. Hopewell, +6 authors D. Altman
- Medicine
- Journal of clinical epidemiology
- 2010
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial… Expand
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
- K. Schulz, I. Chalmers, R. Hayes, D. Altman
- Medicine
- JAMA
- 1 February 1995
OBJECTIVE
To determine if inadequate approaches to randomized controlled trial design and execution are associated with evidence of bias in estimating treatment effects.
DESIGN
An observational… Expand
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
- I. Boutron, D. Moher, D. Altman, K. Schulz, P. Ravaud
- Medicine
- Annals of internal medicine
- 19 February 2008
Adequate reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is necessary to allow accurate critical appraisal of the validity and applicability of the results. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of… Expand
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
- D. Moher, K. Schulz, D. Altman, for the Consort Group
- Medicine
- Clinical Oral Investigations
- 31 January 2003
To comprehend the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation. That goal can be achieved only through total transparency… Expand
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials
The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomized, controlled trials. Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version,… Expand