Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
TLDR
It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment.
View on Publisher
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
View on Elsevier
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
TLDR
The cognitive basis of cooperative decision-making in humans using a dual-process framework is explored and it is proposed that cooperation is intuitive because cooperative heuristics are developed in daily life where cooperation is typically advantageous.
View on Nature
The secret joke of Kant's soul.
View via Publisher
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
View on Elsevier
Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
View on Elsevier
Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.
TLDR
A theory of why (and for whom) intuition favors cooperation is presented: cooperation is typically advantageous in everyday life, leading to the formation of generalized cooperative intuitions, which tend to be more cooperative than deliberative responses in one-shot anonymous interactions.
View on PubMed
Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains
View on Elsevier
Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment
View on Elsevier
Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them
Our brains were designed for tribal life, for getting along with a select group of others (Us), and for fighting off everyone else (Them). But modern life has thrust the world's tribes into a shared…
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License