• Publications
  • Influence
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal andExpand
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TLDR
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and describe the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly changing environment. Expand
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
TLDR
An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented. Expand
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
TLDR
The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included. Expand
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results,Expand
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
TLDR
This Explanation and Elaboration document explains the meaning and rationale for each checklist item and includes an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. Expand
PRISMA statement.
TLDR
The authors misrepresent the nature of registration, suggesting that this process would involve a judgement of originality and scientific merit of the planned research, and are not as confident as Takkouche and Norman about the effectiveness of peer review. Expand
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
TLDR
The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations and strongly recommends that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRit Statement. Expand
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
TLDR
How to interpret funnel plot asymmetry, recommends appropriate tests, and explains the implications for choice of meta-analysis model are described. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...