• Publications
  • Influence
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
TLDR
The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency. Expand
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
TLDR
A system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts is developed, and a summary of the approach from the perspective of a guideline user is presented. Expand
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control.
TLDR
The Asthma Control Questionnaire has strong evaluative and discriminative properties and can be used with confidence to measure asthma control. Expand
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.
TLDR
An approach to elucidating the significance of changes in score in quality of life instruments by comparing them to global ratings of change is developed, and a plausible range within which the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) falls is established. Expand
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
TLDR
The approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. Expand
American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee
To update the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2000 recommendations for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) and develop new recommendations for hand OA.
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
TLDR
The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes, and provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect. Expand
A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.
TLDR
It has been shown that the questionnaire is precise, valid, and responsive and can therefore serve as a useful disease specific measure of quality of life for clinical trials. Expand
Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire for Measuring Child Oral-health-related Quality of Life
TLDR
The results suggest that the CPQ11-14, a self-report measure of the impact of oral and oro-facial conditions on 11- to 14-year-old children, is valid and reliable. Expand
Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine
TLDR
You are back where you were in the previous article1 on diagnostic tests: in the library studying an article that will guide you in interpreting ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scans. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...