Learn More
Risk analysis and testing are conducted for different purposes. Risk analysis and testing nevertheless involve processes that may be combined to the benefit of both. We may use testing to support risk analysis and risk analysis to support testing. This paper surveys literature on the combined use of risk analysis and testing. First, the existing approaches(More)
We present an approach for secure information flow property preserving refinement and transformation of UML inspired interaction diagrams.The approach is formally underpinned by trace-semantics.The semantics is sufficiently expressive to distinguish underspecification from explicit nondeterminism. A running example is used to introduce the approach and to(More)
We address the problem of maintaining information flow security under refinement and transformation. To this end we define a schema for the specification of secure information flow properties and show that all security properties defined in the schema are preserved by a notion of refinement. Refinement is a process that requires human guidance and is in(More)
Risk management is coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk, and includes the identification, analysis and mitigation of unacceptable risks. For critical infrastruc-tures consisting of interdependent systems, risk analysis and mitigation is challenging because the overall risk picture can be strongly affected by(More)
STAIRS is a formal approach to system development with UML 2.1 sequence diagrams that supports an incremental and modular development process. STAIRS is underpinned by denotational and operational semantics that have been proved to be equivalent. STAIRS is more expressive than most approaches with a formal notion of refinement. STAIRS supports a stepwise(More)
We present a method for (1) specifying high-level security policies using UML sequence diagrams and (2) transforming high-level sequence diagram policies into low-level state machine policies that can be enforced by monitoring mechanisms. We believe that the method is both easy to use and useful since it automates much of the policy formaliza-tion process.
We present an evaluation of the Graphical Modeling Framework (GMF) based on our experiences in developing an editor for the risk modeling language CORAS using GMF. Our main hypothesis is that GMF shortens development time and results in more reliable and maintainable systems than alternative approaches which are not based on code generation. We conclude(More)