Share This Author
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments
Contents: Preface. Introduction. Part I: Historical Backgrounds. Analytic, Dialectic and Rhetoric. Analysis of Fallacies, Controversy, and Discussion. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric.…
Handbook of Argumentation Theory
- F. V. Eemeren, B. Garssen, E. Krabbe, A. F. S. Henkemans, Bart Verheij, Jean H. M. Wagemans
The Handbook Argumentation Theory provides an up to date survey of the various theoretical contributions to the development of argumentation theory for all scholars interested in argumentation,…
What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?*
WHAT IS REASONING? WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?* T HESE are changing times for logic, as the subject is studied and taught in philosophy departments. In recent years, there has been the advent of informal…
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse analyzes argumentation in ordinary disputes. The analysis begins with an ideal model: a theoretical structure of discourse that might be used to resolve a…
Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation
The structure of argumentation,Standpoints and Argumentation, and Fallacies: The Soundness of Argumentation.
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
- F. V. Eemeren
- 31 July 2018
This article reviews Frans H. van Eemeren’s Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Springer 2018). Résumé: Cet article est une critique de Théorie de l'argumentation: une perspective…
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Ad hominem fallacies an exemplary study on the basis of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules.
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse, A Pragma-Dialectical Study
The ideal model of a critical discussion as a theoretical framework, the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentative discourse, and some complications are outlined.