• Publications
  • Influence
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
1. Introduction 2. The realm of argumentation studies 3. A model of a critical discussion 4. Relevance 5. Analysis as reconstruction 6. Rules for a critical discussion 7. Fallacies 8. A code ofExpand
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective
Contents: Part I:Argumentation and Communication. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Standpoints and Differences of Opinion. Argumentation as a Complex Speech Act. Speech Acts in a Critical Discussion.Expand
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategicExpand
Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
Preface. 1. And Always the Twain Shall Meet F.H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser. 2. Reasonable Argument Before Aristotle: The Roots of the Enthymeme J.A.E. Bons. 3. Meeting in the House of Callias: anExpand
Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity
TLDR
By concentrating on three conventionalised activity types that are more or less institutionalised, van Eemeren and Houtlosser show how strategic manoeuvring is affected by the opportunities and constraints of the activity type in which it takes place. Expand
Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Shifts and Fallacies*
The critical discussion is clearly a major context of dialogue to use as a normative model in evaluating arguments as fallacious or not.1 However, this paper will study other types of dialogue thatExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...